Weave-UNISONO call: important notice for Polish research teams

Kod CSS i JS
  1. Under the Weave-UNISONO call, if a joint proposal is submitted to the SNSF as the lead agency by 1 October 2026, an NCN proposal must be submitted electronically via the OSF submission system as soon as possible following the submission of the joint proposal to the SNSF, by 8 October 2026 at the latest.
  2. Once the work on the NCN proposal has started in the OSF submission system, the Polish research team has 45 calendar days to complete the proposal and submit it to the NCN. After that, the proposal can no longer be edited, in which case a Polish research team that has not sent its proposal to the NCN must prepare a new proposal and complete it in the OSF submission system which may impact the budget for research tasks performed by the Polish research teams specified in the NCN proposal (see points 3 and 4 below). 

    The 45-day period applies only to the period during which NCN proposals may be edited in the OSF submission system. Under Weave-UNISONO, NCN proposals must be submitted to the NCN via the OSF submission system as soon as possible following the submission of joint proposals to the lead agency, within 7 calendar days at the latest.

  3. NCN proposals processed in the OSF submission system:
    • by 30 September 2026 (inclusive), may include research projects that will be carried out by the Polish research teams from 2027 onwards.

      The following years will be included in the project budget, depending on the project implementation period:

      2027-2028 for two-year projects,

      2027-2028-2029 for three-year projects and

      2027-2028-2029-2030 for four-year projects;

    • from 1 October 2026 (inclusive), may include research projects that will be carried out by the Polish research teams from 2028 onwards.

      The following years will be included in the project budget, depending on the project implementation period:

      2028-2029 for two-year projects,

      2028-2029-2030 for three-year projects and

      2028-2029-2030-2031 for four-year projects.

  4. In the case of joint proposals submitted to the lead agencies covering Polish team budgets from 2027 onwards, make sure that:

    • the work on NCN proposals in the OSF submission system starts before 30 September 2026 and
    • NCN proposals are submitted to the NCN within 45 days of the date that the work on the proposal has started in the OSF submission system.

    If the work on NCN proposals in the OSF submission system starts before 30 September 2026, with project performance scheduled beginning in 2027, and the NCN proposal is not completed and submitted within 45 days of the date the work on the proposal has started in the OSF submission system, a new proposal must be created. A new NCN proposal (created after 1 October 2026) may cover research projects with a start date in 2028. If a joint proposal has already been submitted to the lead agency for a research project involving 2027 funding, information in the NCN proposal will be inconsistent with information in the joint proposal and may result in the proposal being rejected on the grounds that it does not meet the eligibility criteria.

  5. The budget of the Polish part of the project in the joint proposal should be calculated according to the following exchange rate:
    • In joint proposals, for which NCN proposals are processed and submitted via the OSF submission system by 31 December 2026: 1 EUR=4,2626;
    • In joint proposals, for which NCN proposals are processed and submitted via the OSF submission system from 1 January 2027 onwards: 1 EUR=4,3180 PLN;
  6. NCN proposals processed in the OSF submission system in 2026, to which the exchange rate of 1 EUR=4,2626 PLN applies, must be completed and submitted via the OSF submission system by 31 December 2026, 23:59:59. Otherwise, the proposal can no longer be edited, in which case the Polish research team must prepare a new proposal and complete it in the OSF submission system, to which the exchange rate 1 EUR=4,3180 PLN will apply. If a joint proposal has already been submitted to the lead agency, in which the budget of the Polish part of the project was calculated according to another exchange rate, information in the NCN proposal will be inconsistent with information in the joint proposal and may result in the proposal being rejected on the grounds that it does not meet the eligibility criteria.

SHENG: Pre-announcement of the fifth call for Polish-Chinese research projects

Kod CSS i JS

The National Science Centre (NCN), in cooperation with the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC), plans to launch the fifth edition of the call for research projects carried out by Polish and Chinese research teams.

Under the SHENG 5 call, proposals may be submitted for funding of research projects in selected scientific disciplines:

 

NSFC AreaNCN Panel
Mathematical and Physical Sciences

ST1: Mathematics

ST2: Fundamental constituents of matter

ST3: Condensed matter physics

ST9: Astronomy and space science

Information Sciences

ST6: Computer science and informatics

ST7: Systems Engineering

Earth SciencesST10: Earth sciences
Management SciencesHS4: Individuals, institutions, markets

PLANNED CALL TIMELINE:

  • Call announcement: 15 December 2026
  • Proposal submission deadline in the OSF system: 15 March 2027
  • Proposal submission deadline to NSFC: 15 March 2027
  • Announcement of the call results: November 2027
  • Earliest project start date: January 2028

ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS:

  • Proposals must involve basic research and include joint Polish–Chinese research plan. Research equipment or networking activities can only be funded within projects with a basic research focus. Projects consisting solely of the purchase or development of equipment or solely of activities within scientific networks do not meet the funding criteria and will be rejected.
  • State aid can be applied for under SHENG 5.
  • A person may be indicated as the Principal Investigator in only one proposal submitted in the given edition of the call.
  • Under SHENG 5, research projects may be planned for a period of 36 months.
  • Entities eligible to apply for NCN funding for the Polish part of the research project must be those specified in Article 27(1) of the Act on the National Science Centre of 30 April 2010 (Journal of Laws of 2026, item 101).
  • At the time of submission, the Polish Principal Investigator must be at least PhD holder.
  • Project budgets must comply with the cost eligibility rules applicable at NCN and NSFC, respectively.
  • A budget limit of PLN 1,000,000 is planned to be introduced for the Polish part of the project.
  • The budget of the Chinese part of the project may not exceed RMB 1,500,000.
  • In proposals submitted under the SHENG 5 call, no collaboration may be planned between Polish entities and the following Chinese institutions belonging to the group of Seven Sons of National Defence:

    • Beijing Institute of Technology;
    • Harbin Institute of Technology;
    • Beihang University formally known as Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics;
    • Northwestern Polytechnical University;
    • Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics;
    • Nanjing University of Science and Technology;
    • Harbin Engineering University.

    Any planned collaboration with the above-mentioned institutions will result in the proposal being rejected on formal grounds.

PROPOSAL SUBMISSION RULES:

  • The core application document will be a Joint Project Description (JPD) prepared in English, which must be submitted in identical versions to both funding agencies.
  • Significant differences between the joint Polish-Chinese funding proposals submitted to NCN and NSFC may be rejected on the grounds of ineligibility.

PROPOSAL EVALUATION PROCEDURES:

  • Eligibility checks and merit-based evaluations under the SHENG 5 call will be carried out in parallel by NCN and NSFC.
  • Only proposals that successfully pass the eligibility check conducted by both NCN and NSFC will be admitted to the merit-based evaluation stage.
  • At NCN, proposals admitted to the merit-based evaluation stage will be evaluated in accordance with NCN's evaluation procedures and criteria.
  • At NSFC, proposals admitted to the merit-based evaluation stage will be evaluated in accordance with the evaluation procedures and criteria applicable at NSFC.
  • Only proposals receiving a positive funding recommendation from both NCN and NSFC will be recommended for funding.

This announcement is for information purposes only. Detailed conditions will be set out in the official call text.

CONTACT INFORMATION

Polish side: NCN

Coordinators:

General enquiries:
Jadwiga Spyrka, PhD

Chinese side: NSFC

Mulong DU, PhD

Terms of participation in grant calls amended by NCN Council

Kod CSS i JS

The NCN Council has adopted the amended terms of participation in NCN grant calls announced in June, according to which the number of proposals that a principal investigator may submit in a single year is limited, and eligibility for subsequent OPUS grants is linked to participation in ERC calls. 

At the meeting on 10 September 2026, the NCN Council adopted a Resolution amending the Regulations on awarding funding for research tasks funded by the National Science Centre as regards research projects.

Over the past few years, NCN has observed a steady increase in the number of proposals submitted: in the most popular OPUS and PRELUDIUM calls that number has doubled. Meanwhile, the success rate, measured as the percentage of proposals recommended for funding, has remained relatively low (10-20%).

Furthermore, the increased number of proposals poses a significant organisational challenge for NCN, where the growing volume of proposals has not been accompanied by a commensurate increase in the budget available for grant processing, including the necessary recruitment of additional staff. The ever-growing organisational workload of NCN and the experts involved in the evaluation procedure poses a risk to both the quality and timely completion of the evaluation procedure.

The NCN Council’s rationale for the amendment is to maintain the high quality of NCN’s evaluation procedure, ensure that NCN grant opportunities remain available to researchers at all stages of their research careers, and encourage experienced researchers to make greater use of European research funding opportunities 

From 2027 and 2028, respectively, the following amendments will come into effect:

  • Annual restriction in number of proposals 

In a single calendar year, one person may be designated as the principal investigator in only one proposal submitted to NCN. Another proposal may be submitted in the same year, if at least one of the proposals is submitted to an OPUS LAP call or to a call launched by NCN in collaboration with foreign research-funding agencies, and they are not submitted to the same edition of the call. The new rule will apply to the calls with the proposal submission date falling on or after 1 January 2027.

  • Eligibility for subsequent OPUS grants linked to participation in ERC calls 

A researcher who has received at least two OPUS grants over the past 10 years will be eligible to apply for another OPUS grant, provided they are an ERC grant winner or have submitted a grant proposal to ERC in the proposal submission year or over the past five years, which has been evaluated at least in stage 1. The amendments will apply to the calls with the submission date falling or on after 1 January 2028. 

According to the NCN Council, the restrictions are temporary in nature and will be subject to review as NCN’s conditions, including the budgetary situation, evolve. 

OPUS 32 LAP Weave

Kod CSS i JS

15 September 2026

The National Science Centre (the “NCN”) has launched the OPUS 32 LAP/Weave call for research projects. The call is open to proposals for research projects carried out in international bilateral or trilateral cooperation under the Weave programme and under bilateral Polish-Spanish collaboration, as well as projects carried out with the use of large international research equipment by the Polish research teams. The call is addressed at researchers at any stage of their academic careers, who are planning:

  • research projects without foreign participation (OPUS proposals),

EXAMPLE: A research project carried out by a research team affiliated with a Polish institution.

  • research projects carried out by Polish research teams with the use of large international research equipment (OPUS proposals),

EXAMPLE: A research project carried out by a research team affiliated with a Polish institution, using data from the Gaia space mission launched by the European Space Agency in 2013.

  • research projects with participation of foreign partners that do not apply for funding for that purpose under the Weave programme (however, foreign teams may apply for funding under other research-funding programmes that are not co-launched by NCN pursuant to the LAP under the Weave programme) (OPUS proposals),

EXAMPLE: A research project carried out by a research team affiliated with a Polish institution (applying for NCN funding of the Polish part of the research project), in partnership with French partners that seek independent funding for the French part of the project from other sources.

  • research projects in additional partnership with foreign partners that do not apply for funding for that purpose under the Weave programme and with additional use of large research equipment (OPUS proposals),

EXAMPLE: A research project carried out by a research team affiliated with a Polish institution (applying for NCN funding for the Polish part of the research project), using data from the Gaia space mission launched by the European Space Agency in 2013, in partnership with French partners that seek independent funding for the French part of the project from other sources.

  • research projects within the framework of LAP cooperation under the Weave programme, i.e., in cooperation with foreign research teams from Austria, Czechia, Slovenia, Germany, Switzerland, Luxembourg or Belgium-Flanders that seek parallel funding of the projects from their respective research-funding agencies under the Weave programme, i.e., to FWF, GAČR, ARIS, DFG, SNSF, FNR or FWO (OPUS LAP proposals),

EXAMPLE: A research project carried out by a research team affiliated with a Polish university (applying for NCN funding of the Polish part of the project) in partnership with a German research team that seeks funding from the DFG within the framework of the Weave programme.

  • research projects within the framework of bilateral cooperation with foreign research teams from Spain that seek parallel funding of the projects from the Spanish research-funding agency Agencia Estatal de Investigación del Reino de España (AEI) (OPUS LAP proposals),

EXAMPLE: A research project carried out by a research team affiliated with a Polish university (applying for NCN funding of the Polish part of the project) in partnership with a Spanish research team that seeks funding from AEI.

  • research projects within the framework of LAP cooperation under the Weave programme, in partnership with foreign partners that do not seek funding for that purpose under the Weave programme or with the additional use of large research equipment (OPUS LAP proposals),

EXAMPLE: A research project carried out by a research team affiliated with a Polish institution (applying for NCN funding of the Polish part of the project) in partnership with a German research team applying for DFG funding within the framework of the Weave programme and in partnership with French partners that seek independent funding for the French part of the project from other sources.

International cooperation is not mandatory under OPUS 32 and proposals submitted in partnership with foreign partners will not be given preferential treatment over proposals submitted without such partnerships.

The call budget is PLN 600 million.

Proposals must be submitted electronically through the OSF submission system (https://osf.opi.org.pl/en/) pursuant to the proposal submission procedure by 15 December 2026, at 2:00 p.m.

Proposal forms will be made available in the OSF submission system on 1 October 2026.

OPUS LAP proposals drafted by a Polish research team in partnership with foreign research teams must be submitted via the OSF submission system by 15 December 2026, at 2:00 p.m. Furthermore, each foreign research team involved in a project within the framework of Weave cooperation and in bilateral Polish-Spanish cooperation, must also submit a funding proposal, including a set of required documents, to its respective research-funding agency, by the date and according to the terms specified thereby. Proposals must be submitted as follows:

  • research teams from Austria: to FWF;
  • research teams Czechia: to GAČR;
  • research teams from Slovenia: to ARIS;
  • research teams from Germany: to DFG;
  • research teams from Switzerland: to SNSF;
  • research teams from Luxembourg: to FNR; 
  • research teams from Belgium-Flanders: to FWO; and
  • research teams from Spain: to AEI.

The call results will be published as follows:

OPUS proposalsOPUS LAP proposals

within 6 months of the proposal submission date

 

by the end of June 2027

within 11 months of the proposal submission date, depending on the date the evaluation is approved by the partner institutions from the other countries

 

by the end of November 2027

 

Call timeline for OPUS LAP proposals:

  • in partnership with foreign research teams from Austria, Czechia, Switzerland, Luxembourg and Belgium-Flanders: end of July 2027
  • in partnership with foreign research teams from Slovenia, Germany and Spain: mid-November 2027

The dates above are approximate and the publication of final results also depend of the partner agencies. 

Significant modifications:

  • Bilateral Polish-Spanish cooperation will be allowed.

    Pursuant to the Memorandum of Understanding between NCN and Agencia Estatal de Investigación del Reino de España (AEI), OPUS 32+LAP/Weave will be, for the first time, open to funding proposals for projects carried out through bilateral Polish-Spanish collaboration.

  • A more precise definition of international calls for proposals was developed.

    NCN calls launched in collaboration with foreign research-finding agencies include:

    • calls launched under EU-funded programmes;
    • calls launched by NCN in collaboration with other research-funding agencies, within the framework of bilateral collaboration and non-EU funded programmes, including calls following the LAP collaboration and calls funded under the EEA and Norway Grants. 
  • An obligation was introduced to list retracted papers in the proposals submitted in response to the call and in NCN-funded grant reports. The applicants are required to include a list of papers published by all researchers (including senior researchers), whose academic and research track record is presented, retracted in the proposal submission year (as of the proposal submission date) and during the period covering papers published or accepted for publication (including career breaks, as noted in footnote 3 to the Terms of the National Science Centre’s call for research projects), which must not be less than 10 years prior to the proposal submission year, and the reasons for retraction (if applicable); a link to the Resolution is available here.
  • A call for post-docs is open to researchers with a PhD conferred in the year of employment in the project or within 12 years before 1 January of the year of employment in the project, which period may be extended by well-evidenced career breaks.
  • A deadline for the re-evaluation of the proposal (following the annulment of the Director’s decision by the Committee of Appeals) was extended from 5 to 6 months. 

In response to the Russian invasion of Ukraine, pursuant to a Resolution adopted by NCN, proposals submitted to the National Science Centre must not provide for any collaboration between Polish and Russian entities. Where any such collaboration is planned, the proposals will be rejected as ineligible.

Show all»

Hide all«

WHO MAY APPLY FOR FUNDING?

Proposals may be submitted to the call by entities specified in the Act on the National Science Centre, namely:

  1. universities;
  2. federations of science and higher education entities;
  3. research institutes of the Polish Academy of Sciences operating pursuant to the Act on the Polish Academy of Sciences of 30 April 2010 (Journal of Laws of 2020, item 1796, as amended);
  4. research institutes operating pursuant to the Act on Research Institutes of 30 April 2010 (Journal of Laws of 2024, item 534);
  5. international research institutes established pursuant to separate acts, operating in the Republic of Poland;

    5a. Łukasiewicz Centre operating pursuant to the Act on the Łukasiewicz Research Network of 21 February 2019 (Journal of Laws of 2024, item 925 and 1089);

    5b. institutes operating within the Łukasiewicz Research Network;

    5c. Centre of Postgraduate Medical Education operating pursuant to the Act on the Centre of Postgraduate Medical Education of 13 September 2018 (Journal of Laws 2024, Items 570 and 1897),

  6. Polish Academy of Arts and Sciences;
  7. other institutions involved in research independently on a continuous basis (other than listed in sections 1-6);
  8. groups of entities (at least two entities mentioned in sections 1-7 or at least one institution as such together with at least one company);
  9. scientific and industrial centres within the meaning of the Act on Research Institutes of 30 April 2010 (Journal of Laws of 2022, item 498);
  10. research centres of the Polish Academy of Sciences within the meaning of the Act on the Polish Academy of Sciences of 30 April 2010 (Journal of Laws of 2020, item 1796);
  11. scientific libraries;
  12. companies operating as research and development centres within the meaning of the Act on Certain Forms of Support for Innovative Activity of 30 May 2008 (Journal of Laws of 2021, item 706 and of 2022, item 1079);
  13. legal entities with registered office in Poland;

    13a. President of the Central Office of Measures;

  14. natural persons and
  15. companies conducting research in another organisational form than laid down in sections 1-13a.

WHICH PROPOSAL SHOULD BE SUBMITTED (OPUS OR OPUS LAP)?

WHO MAY ACT AS A PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR?

Researchers with or without a PhD, whose scientific achievements include at least one research paper published or accepted for publication, are eligible to act as principal investigators. In the case of research in the arts, the principal investigator must have at least one paper published or accepted for publication or at least one artistic achievement or achievement in research in art completed. The proposal must include artistic works and/or achievements covering the period of the last 10 years before the proposal submission year (as of 2016). In specific cases, this period can be extended (by long-term (in excess of 90 days) documented sick leaves or physiotherapy leaves granted on account of being unfit to work. In addition, this period may be extended by the number of months of a childcare leave granted pursuant to the Labour Code and in the case of women, by 18 months for every child born or adopted child, whichever manner of accounting for career breaks is preferable.

In the case of OPUS LAP proposals, a principal investigator of each research team involved in the project must be identified, i.e., two principal investigators in the case of bilateral cooperation and three in the case of trilateral cooperation, including a principal investigator for the Polish research team and principal investigator(s) for the foreign research team(s).

The principal investigator is required to spend at least 50% of the project duration period in Poland or at the foreign division of the participating entity, and be available to the participating entity. The foregoing obligation does not apply to evidenced project-related business trips or holiday, time off work and other absence from work governed by the applicable laws.

Furthermore, the principal investigator for the Polish research team must be employed at the host institution for the Polish part of the research project for the entire project duration period pursuant to at least a part-time employment contract. The employment requirement does not apply to persons receiving pension under the social insurance scheme.

WHAT IS THE WEAVE PROGRAMME?

The Weave programme relies on multilateral cooperation between the research-funding institutions associated in Science Europe and is aimed at simplifying the proposal submission and evaluation procedure concerning multilateral international research projects. The programme follows the Lead Agency Procedure (LAP) which is a new proposal review standard adopted by European research-funding institutions, designed to make it easier for international research teams to seek funding for joint research projects, as well as to streamline the process of proposal review by research-funding institutions. The procedure rests on the following key principles:

  • the use of domestic calls carried out by partner agencies to perform a merit-based evaluation of domestic as well as international bilateral and multilateral proposals, which compete on equal terms with domestic proposals;
  • trust in the quality of peer review among cooperating institutions.

Thereby, funding proposals for joint projects involving at least two research teams from different countries, formed to conduct joint research, are reviewed by one institution only, known as the lead agency, relevant to one of the teams involved in the project, under a call from its regular portfolio. The results of a merit-based evaluation performed by the lead agency are then approved by the other institutions co-launching the call, which award funding to research projects recommended for funding as a result of that evaluation.

In the case of OPUS 32, the LAP cooperation is possible under the Weave programme cooperation between NCN and:

  • FWF – Austrian Science Fund;
  • GAČR – Czech Science Foundation;
  • ARIS – Slovenian Research and Innovation Agency;
  • DFG – German Research Foundation;
  • SNSF – Swiss National Science Foundation;
  • FNR – Luxembourg National Research Fund; and
  • FWO – Research Foundation – Flanders.

The Polish research team is the coordinating applicant that submits an OPUS LAP proposal to NCN. NCN as the lead agency under OPUS 32 will perform a merit-based evaluation of OPUS LAP funding proposals for research projects carried out by research teams from Poland, as well as Austria, Czechia, Germany, Slovenia, Switzerland, Luxembourg or Belgium-Flanders.

Proposals for research projects carried out in bilateral or trilateral cooperation between research teams from Poland, Austria, Czechia, Germany, Slovenia, Switzerland, Luxembourg and Belgium-Flanders in which the FWF, GAČR, DFG, ARIS, SNSF, FNR and FWO act as the lead agency, can be submitted to the Weave-UNISONO call.

COLLABORATION WITH SPANISH RESEARCH TEAMS

Pursuant to the Memorandum of Understanding between NCN and Agencia Estatal de Investigación del Reino de España (AEI), OPUS 32+LAP/Weave will be open to funding proposals for projects carried out through bilateral Polish-Spanish collaboration, which will be evaluated by NCN as the Lead Agency. 

Funding proposals for projects carried out through bilateral Polish-Spanish collaboration submitted to the FLAMENCO call will be evaluated by AEI as the Lead Agency.  

ARE THERE ANY LIMITS ON SUBMITTING PROPOSALS FOR RESEARCH PROJECTS UNDER NCN CALLS?

Limits on submitting proposals are laid down in Chapter III of the Regulations on awarding funding for research tasks funded by the National Science Centre as regards research projects.

A researcher may be named as the principal investigator in only one proposal which means that in the present edition of NCN calls, a researcher can only be named once as the principal investigator in an OPUS proposal, OPUS LAP proposal or SONATA proposal.

Proposals covering research tasks overlapping tasks specified in another proposal submitted earlier may only be submitted after the NCN Director’s decision to refuse funding has become final, subject to §22.

An NCN Council member must not be named as the principal investigator or research team member or mentor in a proposal submitted during their term of office as the NCN Council member. A researcher who no longer sits on the NCN Council can be named as the principal investigator in a proposal at least 4 months* after the date of their ceasing to act as the Council member.

*This condition must be met on the end date of the call for proposals.

The total number of NCN projects managed by a researcher and proposals submitted to NCN and subject to evaluation or recommended for funding in which that researcher is named as the principal investigator, must not be more than two, or three if the researcher manages at least one project funded under an international NCN call or has submitted at least one proposal to an international NCN call.

The table below illustrates the eligible funding requests.

Number of NCN research projects I manage 1 and proposals 2 I have submitted to NCNCan I submit another funding proposal?
TotalResearch projects OR proposals in domestic calls3Research projects OR proposals in international calls4domestic callinternational call
00YESYES
11YESYES
220NOYES
211YESYES
202YESYES
≥33NONO

Explanation:

1 Project management applies to the period from the date of signing the funding agreement under NCN calls until the date of submitting the final report on the project performance.

2 The limit applies to proposals pending evaluation or recommended for funding.

3 Research projects or proposals under NCN calls: OPUS, PRELUDIUM, SONATINA, SONATA, SONATA BIS, MAESTRO and research projects under HARMONIA,SYMFONIA, Covid-19.

4 The calls launched by NCN in collaboration with foreign research-funding agencies include:

  • calls launched under EU-funded programmes;
  • calls launched by NCN in collaboration with other research-funding agencies within the framework of bilateral collaboration and non-EU funded programmes, including calls following the LAP collaboration and calls under the EEA and Norway Grants 

The limits do not include:

  • PRELUDIUM BIS, DIOSCURI, TANGO, and ARTIQ projects/ proposals;
  • MINIATURA proposals/ research activities;
  • NAWA proposals/ research components;
  • FUGA and UWERTURA fellowships;
  • ETIUDA scholarships;
  • Special funding scheme for researchers from Ukraine to continue research in Poland and special scholarship programme for students and early-career researchers from Ukraine.

The new limits will apply as of 1 January 2027, i.e. to all calls with proposal submission deadlines falling on or after 1 January 2027.

In a single calendar year, subject to points 1 and 2 below, one may be identified as the principal investigator in one proposal only. Another proposal may be submitted in the same calendar year, with the same person identified as the principal investigator, if at least one of the proposals is submitted in response to an OPUS LAP call or in response to a call launched by NCN in collaboration with foreign research-funding agencies, and they are not submitted to the same edition of the call. 

Should these limits be breached, only the proposal submitted first through the OSF submission system will be evaluated. 

The limits referred to herein do not apply to proposals rejected as ineligible.  

  1. The total number of NCN projects managed by a researcher (where project management applies to the period from the date of signing the funding agreement under NCN calls until the date of submitting the final report on the project performance) and proposals submitted to NCN pending evaluation or recommended for funding in which that researcher is named as the principal investigator, must not be more than two.
  2. The limit referred to above may be three if the researcher manages at least one project funded under an OPUS LAP call or under a call launched by NCN in collaboration with foreign research funding-agencies or has been named as the principal investigator in at least one proposal submitted to NCN pending evaluation or recommended for funding under OPUS LAP or under a call launched by NCN in collaboration with foreign research-funding agencies.

The limits do not apply to projects funded under or proposals submitted to PRELUDIUM BIS and DIOSCURI.

WHAT TOPICS CAN RESEARCH PROJECTS COVER?

Basic research proposals may be submitted to the call in any of 26 NCN panelswithin three areas:

  • HS – Humanities, Social Sciences and Art Sciences;
  • ST – Physical Sciences and Engineering;
  • NZ – Life Sciences.

Proposals are reviewed within the panels to which they have been submitted (e.g., HS1, ST1, NZ1). The principal investigator selects the panel. The panel cannot be changed once the proposal has been submitted. If an incorrect panel is selected, proposals may be rejected.

WHAT IS THE PROJECT DURATION?

Under the call, projects can be carried out over the period of:

OPUS proposalsOPUS LAP proposals
  • 12 months
  • 24 months
  • 36 months
  • 48 months
  • cooperation with research partners from Austria, Switzerland, Slovenia, Luxembourg, Belgium-Flanders or Spain:
    • 24 months
    • 36 months
    • 48 months
  • cooperation with research partners from Germany or Czechia:
    • 24 months
    • 36 months
  • trilateral cooperation between Poland, Czechia and Belgium is not allowed  
  • project duration must be the same (if possible) or as similar as possible for all research teams involved in the project

WHAT TYPE OF POSITIONS ARE HELD BY THE RESEARCH TEAM MEMBERS?

The terms of the call do not specify the maximum number of research team members.

Apart from the principal investigators, research tasks may also be performed by co-investigators, including students, PhD students, post-docs and senior researchers.

A post-doc type post is a full-time post, scheduled by the project’s principal investigator for a person who has been conferred a PhD degree in the year of employment in the project or within 12 years before 1 January of the year of employment in the project (which may be extended by evidenced career breaks, in accordance with the section on the costs of the regulations on awarding funding).

A post-doc must have been conferred a PhD degree by an institution other than the one employing them at this position. Otherwise, they must have completed a continuous and evidenced research fellowship of at least 9 months during their studies at the doctoral school, doctoral studies or after being conferred their PhD at an another institution than the participating entity for the project and outside the country in which their  PhD degree was conferred. A prospective post-doc must be selected in an open call.

PhD students/students who will be NCN scholarship recipients in the project, must be recruited in an open call procedure.

A senior researcher position is a full-time employment position co-financed by the host institution to provide employment for a person who has been conferred a PhD degree at least 7 years before the proposal submission date, has expertise, unique competencies and experience necessary to perform the tasks in the project.

Senior researchers must not be involved in research projects covered by OPUS-LAP proposals.

The rationale of involvement of individual members of the research teams in the project is evaluated by the Expert Team. The proposal must include the description of competencies and tasks of individual members of the research team. For more information on the costs of salaries and scholarships, please refer to the Types of costs in research projects funded by NCN. 

HOW SHOULD THE POLISH PROJECT BUDGET BE PLANNED?

The budget is an important aspect of the proposal and is subject to an of eligibility check and merit-based evaluation.

The project budget must be well-justified as regards the subject and scope of research, based on realistic calculations and must specify the expenditures to be covered by NCN (eligible costs). The terms of the call do not specify the total maximum or minimum amount of the project costs that can be requested, however an unjustified budget may result in the proposal being rejected.

According to the Regulations, the project budget (eligible costs) includes direct and indirect costs.

Direct costs include funds for:

  1. remuneration for the principal investigator:
  2. remuneration for co-investigators in the project:
  • full-time employment of post-docs,
  • full-time employment of senior researchers,
  • salaries and scholarships for students and PhD students,
  • additional remuneration for members of the research team; if the principal investigator is not to be employed full-time in the project, their remuneration is paid from the pool allocated for additional remuneration;
  1. purchase of research equipment, devices and software;
  2. purchase of materials and small equipment;
  3. outsourced services;
  4. business trips, visits and consultations (For OPUS LAP proposals: the costs of consultations and visits of co-investigators from research institutions that receive parallel funding from FWF, GAČR, ARIS, DFG, SNSF, FNR, FWO or AEI are not eligible);
  5. compensation for collective investigators and
  6. other costs crucial to the project which comply with the Types of costs in research projects funded by the National Science Centre.

Indirect costs include:

  • indirect costs of up to 20% of direct costs that may be spent on the costs that are directly related to the project, including the cost of open access to publications and research data,
  • indirect costs of open access of up to 2% of direct costs that may only be spent on open access to publications and research data.

For entities applying for state aid, indirect costs including indirect costs of open access and other indirect costs, must not exceed a total of 20% of the direct costs.

During the project implementation, the host institution must agree with the principal investigator the coverage of at least 25% of the indirect costs. Any expenditure made from that amount must be eligible.

For more information on the eligibility of the costs, please go to the Types of costs in research projects funded by NCN.

OPUS LAP proposals must contain a budget table listing project costs of all foreign research teams involved in the project, drafted in accordance with the respective rules of the FWF, GAČR, DFG, ARIS, SNSF, FNR, FWO and AEI. Choose and complete a budget table section in Excel appropriate for the research team.

The budget must include the costs requested by foreign research teams from the FWF, GAČR, DFG, ARIS, SNSF, FNR, FWO and AEI identical with the costs specified in the NCN proposals submitted to the said institutions, as well as justifications for the amounts entered. Foreign project budgets in the budget table are subject to a merit-based evaluation to verify whether the project costs are reasonable as regards the subject and scope of research.

If the costs in the budget table are not justified, the proposal may be rejected.

The costs in the budget table must be entered in EUR (budgets of research teams from Austria, Slovenia, Germany, Luxembourg, Belgium-Flanders and Spain) and in CZK (budgets of research teams from Czechia) or in CHF (budgets of research teams from Switzerland), according to the following exchange rates:

  • 1 EUR = PLN 4.3180
  • 1 CZK = PLN 0.1781
  • 1 CHF = PLN 4.5792

A completed budget table must be annexed to OPUS LAP proposals.

In the case of OPUS LAP proposals, research projects carried out by the Polish research teams as of 2028 may be planned in the OSF submission system.

For more information and examples of the budget table, please refer to the Guidelines for Polish research teams submitting OPUS LAP proposals.

OPEN ACCESS PUBLICATION OF RESEARCH RESULTS

Applicable version of 10 July 2025

Pursuant to the Open Access Policy, all research results must be, if possible, made available in immediate open access.

The National Science Centre recognizes the following publication routes as compliant with its Open Access Policy:

  1. publication in open access journals and on open access platforms registered, or with pending registration, in the Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ);
  2. publication in subscription journals (in which the articles require payment of a subscription fee) and/or hybrid journals (in which some of the articles are open access and some require payment of a subscription fee); in case of publishing in subscription-based model, it is advisable that Author Accepted Manuscript (AAM, i.e. the final manuscript version created by the author, including all the revisions introduced after the peer review, and accepted for publication in the journal; other terms: postprint or author’s accepted manuscript) or preprint, be made available in the repository listed in the Directory of Open Access Repositories (OpenDOAR); if the AAM/preprint is not made available, it will not affect the acknowledgment of expenses or the settlement of the project;
  3. publication in journals covered by an open access licence within the framework of so-called transformative agreements (which are available within limited time in accordance with the applicable agreements between national publishing consortia; journals covered by Polish transformative agreements are listed on the website of the Virtual Library of Science.

Manuscripts must be published under the following licences:

  • Route 1: Creative Commons (CC) licence or equivalent open licence in line with the open access policies;
  • Route 2: Version of Record (VoR, i.e. manuscript version published in a journal with its own typeface and branding; other terms: published version or publisher’s pdf), AAM or preprint should be made available in the repository using CC licence or equivalent open licence in line with the open access policies;
  • Route 3: CC licence or equivalent open licence in line with the open access policies.

Eligibility of Article Processing Charges:

The costs are eligible for each publication route and each CC licence or equivalent open licence in line with the open licence policies. NCN does not recommend incurring APC fees for articles published under Route 2, if the AAM or preprint can be made available in the repository at no charge.

The data underpinning scientific publications resulting from the projects must be well-documented pursuant to the standards of the machine or manual findability, accessibility, interoperability or reusability (the so-called FAIR Data). Where possible, data must be made available in the repository using CC0 or CC BY 4.0 licence. Other licences can also be used as long as they ensure an equivalent level of data openness and reusability as CC0 or CC BY 4.0.

The term “data” is understood by NCN as data collected and unprocessed as well as data generated and analysed, other than scientific publications. The definition comprises all forms, both digital and non-digital.

PROPOSAL FORM

The information required in the proposal:

The information below must be entered in English.

The required parts of the proposal are laid down in the proposal form template applicable to OPUS and OPUS LAP.

OPUS proposalsOPUS LAP proposals

1. Information on the principal investigator, including:

  • information on their academic and research career and research experience, as well as 1-10 papers; for research in art, 1-10 most important papers published or artistic achievements and achievements in research in art;
  • a list of papers retracted in the proposal submission year (as of the proposal submission date) and during the period covering papers published or accepted for publication (including career breaks, as noted in footnote 2), which must not be less than 10 years prior to the proposal submission year, and the reasons for retraction (if applicable);
  • information on research project management or other research funding under NCN calls or under other national or international calls;

in the proposal submission year or over the period of 10 years prior to the proposal submission year (including applicable breaks);

1. Information on the principal investigators (principal investigator for the Polish research team and principal investigator(s) for the foreign research team(s)), including:

  • information on their academic and research career and research experience, as well as 1-10 papers; for research in art, 1-10 most important papers published or artistic achievements and achievements in research in art;
  • a list of papers retracted in the proposal submission year (as of the proposal submission date) and during the period covering papers published or accepted for publication (including career breaks, as noted in footnote 2), which must not be less than 10 years prior to the proposal submission year, and the reasons for retraction (if applicable)
  • information on research project management or other research funding under NCN calls or under other national calls;

in the proposal submission year or over the period of 10 years prior to the proposal submission year (including applicable breaks);

2. key information on the proposal and host institution for the project (also in Polish);2. key information on the proposal and host institutions for the project (information for Polish entities also in Polish);
3. work plan (also in Polish);3. work plan including research tasks performed by the Polish research team (also in Polish) and by each foreign research team involved in the project;
4. information on the scope of work carried out by the co-investigators in the project;
5. summary of the project;
6. abstract for the general public (also in Polish);
7. short project description with bibliography (up to 5 pages, A4; project literature does not count towards the page limit);
8. full project description with bibliography (up to 15 pages, A4; project literature does not count towards the page limit);
9. information on research projects carried out in international cooperation and related benefits (required only for projects performed with the use of large international research equipment by the Polish research teams or in cooperation with foreign partners);9. information on research projects carried out in international cooperation and related benefits (only for projects performed pursuant to the LAP cooperation or with the use of large international research equipment by the Polish research teams or in cooperation with foreign partners);
NCN does not require any documents (agreements) confirming the LAP cooperation between Polish and foreign research teams.
10. information on ethical aspects of research
11. information on the data management plan concerning data generated or used in the course of a research project, as required by the proposal;
12. project budget drafted in accordance with the Regulations;12. Polish project budget drafted in accordance with the Regulations and foreign project budget included in the budget table drafted in accordance with the respective rules of the FWF, GAČR, ARIS, DFG, SNSF, FNR, FWO or AEI.

In the Osoby wskazane we wniosku [Individuals identified in the proposal] tab, enter the data of all persons who have been involved in the preparation of the proposal or will be involved in the project performance. At this point, enter the names of all persons whose data (name, affiliation) has been entered in other parts of the proposal. The applicant is required to notify such persons that their details have been disclosed in the proposal and will be processed by NCN. This section is not subject to a review.

CAN PROPOSALS IN THIS CALL INCLUDE APPLICATION FOR STATE AID?

Proposals in the call may include application for state aid, except where funding is requested by an individual. For more details, please visit the State Aid website.

In the case of research projects carried out in a host institution for which project funding constitutes state aid, funds for students and PhD students can only be planned in the form described in the category “salary for students and PhD students” in the Types of costs in research projects funded by NCN.

All documents concerning proposals for state aid must be signed with a qualified electronic signature in the PAdES format.

PLEASE NOTE:

Pursuant to the Regulation on State Aid Provided via NCN adopted by the Ministry of Science and Higher Education on 9 September 2015, state aid may be provided by 30 June 2027. If a project is recommended for funding and the funding agreement is signed after 30 June 2027, the entity may be requested to submit additional annexes and make modifications to the project relating to state aid in accordance with the new regulation. 

WHAT IS THE PROPOSAL EVALUATION PROCEDURE?

Proposals are subject to an eligibility check followed by a merit-based evaluation.

Eligibility check:

OPUS proposalsOPUS LAP proposals
NCN coordinatorsNCN coordinators and partner institutions, i.e. FWF, GAČR, ARIS, DFG, SNSF, FNR, FWO or AEI when proposals are submitted by the foreign research teams, according to their respective rules.

Only complete proposals that comply with the requirements of the call text are eligible for a merit-based evaluation. A proposal may also be rejected as ineligible at the later stage of evaluation.

In response to the Russian invasion of Ukraine, pursuant to a Resolution adopted by NCN, proposals submitted to the National Science Centre must not provide for any collaboration between Polish and Russian entities. Where any such collaboration is planned, the proposals will be rejected as ineligible.

Under OPUS 32, OPUS LAP proposals are evaluated together with other proposals submitted to the call.

Proposals approved as eligible are subject to a merit-based evaluation:

Merit-based evaluation

Proposals are subject to a merit-based evaluation performed in two stages by the Expert Teams (whose members are selected by the NCN Council) and external experts who are not Expert Team members:

Stage I: Evaluation by an Expert Team formed by the NCN Council, based on the data included in the proposal and annexes thereto, with the exception of the full project description. Individual reviews are drafted by two members of the Expert Team acting independently. In the case of a proposal which is assigned an auxiliary NCN Review Panel specifying disciplines covered by other NCN review panels than the one to which the proposal was submitted, the Chair of the Expert Team may decide to seek another review from a member of another Expert Team (interdisciplinary proposals).

Then, based on the discussions, a list of proposals recommended for stage II of evaluation is compiled by the Expert Team at the first meeting.

Stage II: Proposals are submitted to at least two reviewers who make individual reviews based on the data included in the proposal and annexes thereto, with the exception of the short project description. Then, based on the reviews of the reviewers and discussions at the second meeting, a ranking short list of proposals recommended for funding is compiled by the Expert Team.

The Expert Team recommends only those OPUS LAP proposals for funding that are among 20% of proposals with the highest rank among all those submitted to the OPUS call under individual NCN review panels. Following the merit-based evaluation, NCN provides the partner institutions with information on the results thereof together with a list of projects recommended for funding for their approval.

OPUS LAP proposals recommended for funding by NCN, involving cooperation with German research teams requesting funding from their partner institution Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG), are subject to another review from the DFG. Only proposals successfully reviewed by the DFG can be recommended for funding. The review is performed according to the rules of the partner institution and based on the documents on the evaluation performed by NCN, including the written review.

The NCN Director awards funding for research projects performed by the Polish research teams, provided that the partner institutions award funding to the foreign research teams.

To find out more on the proposal evaluation procedure, please read the Proposal evaluation procedure for the Expert Teams.

Proposals are reviewed within the panels to which they have been submitted (e.g., HS1, ST1, NZ1). The panel is selected by the principal investigator. The panel must not be changed once the proposal has been submitted. Auxiliary NCN Review Panels allow to choose experts and reviewers to perform the merit-based evaluation of proposals. The Chair of the Expert Team may decide that interdisciplinary proposals be subject to another review by an expert from another panel.

WHAT IS REVIEWED IN THE MERIT-BASED EVALUATION OF PROPOSALS?

The following aspects are prioritised during proposal evaluation:

  1. compliance with the basic research criterion;
  2. quality and innovative nature of research or tasks to be performed;
  3. impact of the research project on the advancement of the scientific discipline;
  4. assessment of the feasibility of the proposed research;
  5. scientific achievements of the principal investigator;
  6. assessment of the results of research projects conducted by the principal investigator, funded by NCN or from other sources;
  7. relevance of the costs to be incurred with regards to the subject and scope of the research and
  8. preparation of the proposal and compliance with other requirements of the call text.

The proposal evaluation criteria are laid down in the Regulations on awarding funding for research tasks funded by the National Science Centre.

The following aspects are additionally evaluated in the case of OPUS LAP proposals:

  1. a balanced and complementary contribution of all research teams in the project, which means that the contribution of each team involved in the project must be significant and is necessary, and their respective tasks should complement one another to create a coherent joint research project,
  2. academic and research career of foreign principal investigators and
  3. completion of other research projects by the principal investigators of foreign research teams.

Scientific track record, expertise and unique competences of prospective senior researchers as well as rationale of their employment are subject to a merit-based evaluation (OPUS proposals). A proposal may be rejected if those terms are not met and/or substantial justification is missing.

Proposals with a zero score or “no” decision agreed by the Expert Team in any reviewed criterion (except for the data management and ethics issues in research) must not be recommended for funding.

WHO PERFORMS THE MERIT-BASED EVALUATION OF PROPOSALS?

A merit-based evaluation is performed by the Expert Team pursuant to the terms of the call and evaluation criteria laid down in the Regulations on awarding funding for research tasks funded by the National Science Centre.

Expert teams are selected by the NCN Council in accordance with the terms of Expert Team formation. Experts are outstanding Polish and foreign researchers who are at least PhD holders. Expert teams are established for each call edition. The composition of the Expert Team is subject to the number and subjects of proposals submitted to each panel.

Proposals are reviewed by inter-panel teams (HS1, ST1, NZ1). The principal investigator selects the panel. The panel cannot be changed once the proposal has been submitted. If an incorrect panel is selected, proposals may be rejected.

WHEN AND HOW WILL THE CALL RESULTS BE ANNOUNCED?

The call results are published on the NCN website and communicated to the applicants by way of a decision by the NCN Director as follows:

The dates above are approximate and the publication of final results also depend of the partner agencies.

OPUS proposalsOPUS LAP proposals

within 6 months of the proposal submission date, 

by the end of June 2027

Within 11 months of the proposal submission date, depending on the date the partner agencies approve the evaluation results

 

By the end of 2027

 

The call timeline for OPUS LAP proposals:

  • in partnership with foreign research teams from Austria, Czechia, Switzerland, Luxembourg and Belgium-Flanders: end of July 2027
  • in partnership with foreign research teams from Slovenia, Germany and Spain: mid-November 2027.
  • Polish research teams must provide the merit-based evaluation documents to their partner teams involved in the project (co-applicants) for review.

WHERE CAN ADDITIONAL INFORMATION BE FOUND?

For more information on the call, please read the Information for applicants on the NCN website and Guidelines for Polish research teams submitting OPUS LAP/ Weave proposals. Should you have any more questions or queries, please contact us by e-mail at: informacja@ncn.gov.pl.

USEFUL INFORMATION

If you are intending to submit a proposal to the OPUS 32 call:

  1. read all call documents included in the call text, in particular:
  1. obtain data from the host institution for the project that is required to complete the proposal and find out about the internal procedures that may affect the proposal and project performance (cost planned in the project, procedure for acquiring signature(s) of authorised representative(s) of the entity to confirm submission of the proposal);
  2. if a group of Polish entities applies, a research project cooperation agreement must be drafted;
  3. acceptance letters from publishers must be prepared to confirm that a paper has been accepted for publication (when the scientific achievements section includes papers accepted for publication that have not been published yet).

Before the proposal is submitted to NCN:

  1. check that the information in and annexes to the proposal are correct. The verification of the proposal for completeness in the OSF submission system by pressing the Sprawdź kompletność [Check completeness] button does not guarantee that the information has been entered correctly and that the required annexes have been attached;
  2. check if the tabs have been completed in the correct language according to the guidelines laid down in the proposal form template;
  3. disable the final version of the proposal to NCN;
  4. download and sign the confirmation of proposal submission (principal investigator and authorised representative(s) of the entity);

In addition, in the case of OPUS LAP proposals, NCN does not require that any documents (agreements) confirming LAP cooperation between Polish and foreign research teams be submitted or signatures of foreign research team members placed on OPUS LAP proposals or other documents annexed thereto.

  1. attach the confirmation of proposal submission with a signature.

Once the proposal is completed and relevant annexes attached, the proposal must be submitted to NCN electronically via the OSF submission system using the Wyślij do NCN [Send to NCN] button.

In addition, in the case of OPUS LAP proposals, each foreign research team involved in a project must submit a funding proposal, together with a set of required documents, to its respective partner institution (FWF, GAČR, ARIS, DFG, SNSF, FNR, FWO or AEI), by the date and according to the rules specified thereby. If the partner institution requires applicants to submit a copy of the OPUS LAP proposals to its respective submission system, a complete English language version of the OPUS LAP proposal in PDF format must be generated following submission of the OPUS LAP proposal to the OSF submission system, and sent to the foreign research team.

Once the call for proposals has been closed:

  1. evaluation of proposals will be carried out;
  2. after each stage of evaluation, the funding decision by the NCN Director will be announced;
  3. if a proposal is recommended for funding, an OPUS or OPUS LAP funding agreement will be entered into; and
  4. the project will be carried out pursuant to the funding agreement and Regulations on the implementation of research projects, fellowships and scholarships. In the case of OPUS LAP proposals, research projects must be performed by the Polish and foreign research teams according to the rules of NCN and respective partner institutions.

In the event of a breach of the call procedure or other formal infringements, applicants may appeal against the decision of the NCN Director with the Committee of Appeals of the NCN Council. The appeal must be lodged within 14 days of the effective delivery of the decision.

Please read the rules according to which NCN processes personal data. In the case of OPUS LAP proposals, the following partner institutions are joint controllers of personal data:

Data processing information applicable to the Weave programme is available here.

In the case of OPUS LAP proposals in partnership with research teams from Germany, DFG is the data recipient (www.dfg.de/en/service/privacy_policy).

Call documents

  1. Terms of the OPUS call
  2. Resolution on the OPUS 32 call for research projects carried out pursuant to the Lead Agency Procedure (available soon)
  3. Regulations on awarding funding for research tasks funded by the National Science Centre as regards research projects
  4. NCN panels
  5. Regulations for awarding NCN scholarships in NCN-funded research projects
  6. Costs in research projects funded by the National Science Centre
  7. OPUS and OPUS LAP proposal form templates
  8. Budget table/ OPUS LAP proposals
  9. Research project cooperation agreement (compulsory for groups of entities applying)
  10. State aid
  11. Guidelines for Polish research teams submitting OPUS LAP proposals (available soon)
  12. Guidelines for applicants to complete the proposal in the OSF submission system
  13. Guidelines for applicants to complete the Data Management Plan form in the research project
  14. Guidelines for applicants to complete the Ethics Issues form in the research project
  15. Open Science
  16. Code of the National Science Centre on research integrity and applying for research funding
  17. Proposal submission procedure

Documents applicable to the evaluation of proposals:

  1. Proposal evaluation criteria
  2. Establishing and appointing of Expert Teams
  3. Proposal evaluation procedure for the expert teams
  4. Service of decisions of the NCN Director (available soon)
  5. Appealing against the NCN Director’s decisions

Documents to be read before commencing NCN projects:

  1. OPUS and OPUS LAP agreement templates (available soon)
  2. Procedure for auditing undertakings
  3. Guidelines for entities auditing the implementation of research projects funded by the National Science Centre
  4. NCN Council Resolution on collaboration with the Russian Federation within the framework of NCN-funded grants
  5. Information on personal data processing
  6. NCN position on the use of the tools of the generative AI

The English version of this document does not constitute a sworn translation and has been prepared as an auxiliary document for your convenience. In the event of any doubts as to the interpretation of its provisions, the Polish version shall prevail.

#NCNGeneration– Rafał Szabla: Basic building blocks of life on early Earth

Kod CSS i JS

In the 10th episode of the series, we talk to Rafał Szabl, chemist from the Wrocław University of Science and Technology, who studies how simple chemical compounds could have given rise to the basic building blocks of life on the early Earth  

Prof. Rafał Szabla, theoretical chemist at the Faculty of Chemistry at Wrocław University of Science and Technology, together with his research team, studies the fundamental properties of RNA, DNA, and other biomolecules, their reactivity, and their interactions with ultraviolet radiation. His research into prebiotic chemistry helps us understand how life emerged on the early Earth.

Chemistry of the early Earth

Around 3.8 billion years ago, when the Late Heavy Bombardment ended, liquid water existed on Earth, some land had already formed and there was an atmosphere with practically no molecular oxygen. Researchers associate this period with the origins of life, although the transition from chemistry to the first living organisms remains unclear. “Life is, above all, chemistry. In all living systems—in cells, even the simplest ones—their function is governed by chemistry. Chemistry determines how they manage energy. Chemistry is also responsible for the way they can divide, that is replicate,” says Rafał Szabla.

In small bodies of water, where chemical compounds could become concentrated and reactions could take place efficiently, hydrogen cyanide played a crucial role. Although toxic today, it may have been a key starting point for the formation of more complex structures. It was the initial building block from which something more complex could emerge.

The emerging life needed energy from somewhere. Today, living organisms derive energy from the sun, but in the beginning, other resources of energy were needed. At this point, the researcher puts forward a tentative hypothesis that sugars might have played a key role, dating back to the period when the planet Earth was forming. This is supported by studies of extraterrestrial material: in asteroid samples and observations of protoplanetary disks, as well as during the Rosetta mission to a comet, apart from simple components of RNA and DNA, protein-building amino acids and sugars were also found.

How do scientists study such a distant past?

Since we cannot go back in time and cannot find fossils dating back billions of years, we should rephrase the question about the origin of life on Earth and ask “How could life have emerged under specific conditions,” that is considering the constraints based on our knowledge of the composition of the atmosphere, the chemical composition of the Earth’s crust, and the conditions that may have existed in small lakes and lagoons. 

A groundbreaking moment was a 2009 publication in Nature by John Sutherland, which showed how two of four nucleic acid building blocks could have formed on the early Earth. Ultraviolet radiation played a key role. The same reactions could produce many different products, while ultraviolet radiation favoured the formation of the desired structures. Theoretical chemistry, which is the focus of Rafał Szabla’s research, explains the mechanisms of such reactions through experimentally verified calculations. In collaboration with John Sutherland’s team and co-investigators from the Wrocław University of Science and Technology – prof. Robert Góra and dr Mikołaj Janicki – the researcher explained the mechanisms behind the formation of additional key building blocks of nucleic acids; their paper was published in Nature in 2020. “For me, an extremely fascinating question is how these nucleic acids — RNA or DNA — could have gained their first functionality on the early Earth. For example, how could they have been able to self-replicate.”

Where does basic research take us

Prebiotic chemistry enables us to discover chemical reactions that are completely new, and the knowledge gained paves the way for practical applications, e.g. more efficient DNA replication. Rafał Szabla, however, reminds us that the path from discovery to its application can be long. “Maria Skłodowska-Curie was also driven by curiosity. When she made her first discoveries she could not fully realise how far-reaching their implications would be. Many of these implications were only discovered many, many years later. So without fundamental research, there are no applications — and there will be no applications in the future.”

The #NCNGeneration series consists of 15 conversations with 15 researchers to mark the 15th anniversary of the National Science Centre. Each conversation lasts 15–20 minutes. They are hosted by Anna Korzekwa-Józefowicz.

In earlier episodes, we spoke with Aleksandra Rutkowska, Michał Tomza, Małgorzata Kot, Karolina Ćwiek-Rogalska, Maciej Trusiak, Agata Starosta, Karolina Safarzyńska, Karolina Kremens and Maciej Grzybek. In upcoming episodes, we will hear from Piotr Bystranowski, Artur Obłuski and Monika Wróbel. The episodes are released on NCN’s YouTube channel every third Thursday through the end of the year.

BiodivFuture Call Now Open

Kod CSS i JS

In cooperation with the European Biodiversity Partnership Biodiversa+ we have launched a call for transnational and interdisciplinary research projects in the field of biodiversity conservation science. A total of 1 million EUR is allocated for all Polish research teams. 

The call fosters innovative research contributing to the sustainable, resilient, and integrated restoration efforts for ecosystems and habitats, from community-based to global initiatives. The initiative aims to advance knowledge and practical solutions that support effective biodiversity restoration, while incorporating ecological, socio-economic, and cultural perspectives.

Proposals should address one or more of the 3 following topics:

  • Novel ecosystem functioning: Understanding the functioning of novel ecosystems and their links to socio-cultural and socio-economic dynamics.
  • Pathways to novel ecosystems: Studying pathways to novel ecosystems and associated socio-ecological dynamics under uncertainty and changing conditions.
  • Biodiversity benefits and equity in the context of novel ecosystems: Exploring how biodiversity benefits, costs and trade-offs are shared across contexts, communities and generations.

Funding may be requested by international consortia comprising at least 3 research teams from at least 3 countries participating in the call. The principal investigator of the Polish team must be at least a PhD holder.

Countries participating in the call: 

Austria, Brazil, Bulgaria, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Faroe Islands, Finland, France, Germany, Israel, Italy (Province of Bolzano), Latvia, Lithuania, Moldova, the Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Romania, Slovakia, Slovenia, Switzerland, Taiwan, Tunisia, and the United Kingdom.

Countries whose participation is yet to be confirmed: Belgium, Hungary, Spain, Türkiye

Under the BIODIVERSA+ Partnership’s call, funding may be awarded for remuneration of research team members, salaries and scholarships for students and PhD students, purchase or manufacturing of research equipment, and for other costs crucial to the research project.

Call timeline

The call procedure is divided into two stages. In Stage I, joint pre-proposals are submitted with a foreign partner and the best research teams are invited to submit their joint full proposals in Stage II of the call.

  • Stage I: joint pre-proposal submission to the EPSS submission system: 10 November 2026, 12.00 noon CET
  • Stage II: 
    • joint full proposals submission in the EPSS submission system: 16 April 2027 (12:00 noon CEST).
    • submission of NCN proposals in the OSF system: 23 April 2027, 11:59 p.m. CEST.
  • Call results: November 2027
  • Projects start date: 1 December 2027 – 1 April 2028

Look for a partner or a project to join: Partner Search Tool

NCN at 35th Economic Forum in Karpacz

Kod CSS i JS

NCN will participate in the 35th Economic Forum in Karpacz which will start on 8 September 2026. It is one of the largest gathering of representatives from science, economy and politics in Central and Eastern Europe.

We will take part in the panel discussion on the role of research in strengthening the country’s defence and security capabilities, which will be held under the patronage of NCN on 9 September at 5 p.m., in the Polish Science Sphere organised by the Ministry of Science and Higher Education. The panel discussion will be hosted by the NCN Director Krzysztof Jóźwiak and will feature:

  • Henryk Fiedorowicz, Military University of Technology, NCN Council Member 
  • Jerzy Małachowski, Director of the National Centre of Research and Development 
  • Marcin Górka, Director of the Department of Innovation, Ministry of National Defence  

The main focus will be the role of research in strengthening the country’s defence and security capabilities.

Director Krzysztof Jóźwiak will also take part in two other panel discussions.

One of them (“Can Europe Close the Technology Gap With the US?”) will be held between 11:10 and 12:10 in the University of Warsaw Sphere (Room 6.31). It will be hosted by Tomasz Pilewicz from the Warsaw School of Economics, and will feature:

  • Šarūnas Genys, Head of the Manufacturing Sector Team, Invest Lithuania  
  • Julia Kołodko, Strategic Advisor for Behavioural Science and AI, Onion Brains
  • Artur Popko, CEO, Budimex SA 

The attendees will discuss technology gaps between Europe and the US, particularly in areas such as AI and semi-conductors, as well as the conditions for European technological sovereignty.

Between 14:55 and 15:55, the NCN Director will join the panel discussion “Democracy Needs Science – How to Defend Rational Public Debate?” in the University of Warsaw Sphere (Room 6.31), featuring:

  • Antonin Cohen, President of the Executive Board of Fondation Maison des sciences de l'homme (FMSH, France) 
  • Dorota Olko, Member of the Sejm of the Republic of Poland 
  • Piotr Bromber, Lecturer at the University of Zielona Góra  
  • Marek Kisilowski, Deputy Chairman of the National Science Section of NSZZ “Solidarność"

The attendees will address critical thinking, the ability to distinguish facts from opinions, and the role of researchers, mass media and public institutions in developing knowledge-based debate.

Babies smell divine. Teenagers, not so much.

Kod CSS i JS

An international research team involving researchers from the University of Wrocław received an Ig Nobel Prize for research into why babies smell better than teenagers. 

A research team comprising Prof. Ilona Croy from the University of Jena, Prof. Thomas Hummel from the TU Dresden, and Dr Tomasz Frąckowiak and Prof. Dr hab. Agnieszka Sorokowska from the Faculty of Psychology, University of Wrocław, received Ig Nobel Prize. They have been studying smell for years. 

Their collaboration resulted in the publication “Babies Smell Wonderful to Their Parents, Teenagers Do Not: an Exploratory Questionnaire Study on Children's Age and Personal Odor Ratings in a Polish Sample”. They studied whether parents perceived the odour of their children as pleasant or unpleasant. Their research included a questionnaire study, assessment of odour samples by parents and non-parents, as well as genetic and fMRI-based analyses. 

The research findings are clear-cut. Infant odours were rated as very pleasant, whereas the odours of teenagers, not as pleasant, and sometimes even difficult for their parents to tolerate. The divine scent of babies can then be considered as one of the “cute” features (Kindchenscheme), which increase parents’ motivation and promote caregiving behaviour.

The award-winning research shows that scent plays an important role not only in social relationships but also in underlying biological mechanisms. 

The National Science Centre has supported Prof. Sorokowska’s research for years, in the form of ETIUDA, PRELUDIUM, and two OPUS and SONATA grants. Prof. Sorokowska is currently working on a SONATA BIS grant on psychological effects of parenthood among couples. 

Ig Nobel

The Ig Nobel Prize is a humorous counterpart to the Nobel Prize, aimed at highlighting unusual aspects of scientific work and promoting science. The awards are given to research that may seem amusing at first glance, but above all encourages deeper reflection. Importantly, all awarded studies have genuine scientific value and are published in peer-reviewed, prestigious journals. This year, Ig Nobel Prizes were awarded, among others, to researchers for their studies on aerodynamics of the nose blowing, an attempt to make the definition of kissing, and on turning mosquito proboscises into 3D printing nozzles. 

The Ig Nobel Prize has been awarded since 1991 at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology in Cambridge. This year, for the first time, the award ceremony was moved to Europe, namely to Switzerland. Ig Nobel ceremony events are always unique, and the winners receive a custom trophy, this time in the shape of a human foot covered in mushrooms.

Ig Nobel Prize Ceremony 2026

Last year, Prof. Marcin Zajenkowski from the University of Warsaw received a special distinction in psychology for his research on the impact of feedback about intelligence levels on temporary feelings of narcissism. 

Information about the 2026 Ig Nobel Prize on the University of Wrocław website

AI-based Wi-Fi optimization

Kod CSS i JS

Under the Weave-UNISONO call, researchers from AGH University of Krakow, in collaboration with German researchers, will leverage machine learning to develop more efficient, reliable and equitable Wi-Fi networks. 

The Polish research team headed by Prof. Dr hab. inż. Katarzyna Kosek-Szott from AGH University of Krakow, in collaboration with researchers from Technical University of Berlin, will carry out the project “ML4WiFi2: Machine learning-based Wi-Fi optimisation”. The researchers will explore solutions leveraging machine learning to optimise the performance of wireless networks, particularly in view of the growing number of connected devices and the development of new standards, such as Wi-Fi 7. The scientists will aim to ensure fair interoperation of modern algorithm-driven devices with older equipment. They will also explore how generative AI can enhance WiFi-based sensing, indoor localization, and improve data traffic management. The potential solution will help improve network efficiency and reliability, especially in crowded environments. The project findings may include new applications in, for example, smart homes, offices, and public spaces, and help operators in more efficient network management. The Polish budget of the project is over PLN 908,000. The project was evaluated by DFG, Germany and the evaluation results were approved by NCN under the Weave programme.

Weave-UNISONO and Lead Agency Procedure 

Weave-UNISONO is a result of multilateral cooperation between the research-funding agencies associated in Science Europe and aims at simplifying the submission and selection procedures in all academic disciplines, involving researchers from two or three European countries.

The winning applicants are selected pursuant to the Lead Agency Procedure according to which one partner institution performs a complete merit-based evaluation of proposals, the results of which are subsequently approved by the other partners.

Under the Weave Programme, partner research teams apply for parallel funding to the Lead Agency and their respective institutions participating in the Programme. Joint research projects must include a coherent research program with the added value of the international cooperation clearly identified. 

Weave-UNISONO is carried out on an ongoing basis. Research teams intending to cooperate with partners from Austria, Czechia, Slovenia, Switzerland, Germany, Luxembourg and Belgium-Flanders are urged to read the call text and apply for funding.

Molecular ion, photon and ‘Schrödinger cat in Nature

Kod CSS i JS

Polish researchers from the University of Warsaw, in collaboration with researchers from the Czech Republic and Austria, have developed a method for detecting single-photon absorption by a single molecular ion. Their research findings have just been published in Nature.

Prof. Michał Tomza and Dr Marcin Gronowski from the Faculty of Physics at the University of Warsaw addressed the theoretical part of the research, while experiments were conducted by the research group headed by Prof. Philipp Schindler from the University in Innsbruck, with the participation of a researcher from the Palacký University Olomouc. The National Science Centre funded the Polish part of the research.

Light absorption is usually studied by measuring how much light is lost as it passes through a sample. It does not work with a single molecular ion because the signal is too weak. Instead of detecting the photon, the research team measured the small recoil—or momentum transfer—received by the molecule once a photon is absorbed. The recoil is too small to be measured directly. To detect it, the researchers trapped a molecular ion alongside a calcium atomic ion (Ca+). Their strong Coulomb interaction, i.e. the electrostatic force between charged particles, couples their motion, causing them to form collective modes of motion. The researchers then prepared the system in a non-classical quantum state, known as a Schrödinger cat state. When the molecular ion absorbs a photon, the resulting recoil shifts this state, greatly amplifying the signal. This makes it possible to detect the absorption event by precisely measuring the neighbouring calcium ion through its fluorescence. The method was demonstrated on the O–H stretching vibration in a CaOH+ molecular ion, excited by ultrashort femtosecond laser pulses in the mid-infrared range.

The published results represent an important step towards non-destructive measurements of complex polyatomic molecules and more advanced control of their quantum states. They open up new possibilities for both precision molecular spectroscopy and the development of molecule-based quantum technologies.

Marcin Gronowski and Michał from the University of Warsaw were responsible for the theoretical part of the project. They carried out advanced quantum-chemical calculations of the ion’s electronic structure, predicting an O–H bond vibrational frequency of 3783 cm⁻¹, which enabled the Insbruck team to precisely tune the laser pulses and interpret the experimental results. The calculations were carried out using the Polish PLGrid supercomputing infrastructure hosted at the Academic Computer Centre CYFRONET AGH. 

The two researchers are winners of multiple NCN calls for proposals. In 2020, Prof. Michał Tomza received the NCN Award in Physical Sciences and Engineering. This is yet another paper featuring Michał Tomza that has been published in Nature. In 2021, his research team together with an experimental team led by Professor Tobias Schaetz from the University of Freiburg, were the first to observe Feshbach resonances between a single ion and ultracold atoms.

Prof. Tomza discussed his research a few months ago in the #NCNGeneration series.

This is the second publication by the representatives of the #NCNGeneration in Nature this month. 

The research team of Prof. Marcin Poręba from the Wrocław Tech in collaboration with Genentech, USA, led by Prof. Vishva M. Dixit found a way to prevent cells from dying.