Polish researchers among winners of M-ERA.NET Call 2024

Thu, 02/27/2025 - 16:00
Kod CSS i JS

Fifteen research teams with the participation of Polish researches have been awarded funding for research projects in material science and material engineering under a call launched by the M-ERA.NET network.

Grants were available to international research consortia comprising at least three research teams from at least three countries participating in the call, i.e. Austria, Belgium, Bulgaria, Brazil, Croatia, Czechia, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Spain, Israel, Canada, South Korea, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Latvia, Germany, Poland, South Africa, Romania, Slovakia, Slovenia, Taiwan, Turkey, Hungary and Italy.

382 pre-proposals were submitted to the call, followed by 101 full proposals. Funding was awarded to 31 projects involving 156 research teams.

A total of 15 research projects involving Polish researchers received funding, of which seven (for a total of 2.5 million EUR) will be funded by the National Science Centre and eight by the National Centre for Research and Development (NCBR).

Out of seven projects funded by the NCN, four will be coordinated by the Polish research teams and three will be carried out with the participation of Polish research teams:

  • HerAqua: Innovative nano-carbon based electrochemical monitoring of female hormones. PI in the Polish research team and project coordinator: Dr hab. inż. Katarzyna Siuzdak, Institute of Fluid-Flow Machinery, PAS
  • RESH: Renewable Energy via Sustainable Hydrogen. PI in the Polish research team: Prof. dr hab. Wojciech Macyk, Jagiellonian University in Krakow
  • BIONAFE: Bio-derived nanocarbon-based functional materials for next generation electroceutical devices. PI in the Polish research team and project coordinator: Dr hab. inż. Katarzyna Krukiewicz, Silesian University of Technology
  • GREEN-MEM: Green materials for sustainable magneto-electronics memories: Dr inż. Anna Mandziak, Jagiellonian University in Krakow
  • SMARTPIEZO: Smart Piezoelectric Bio-based Osteochondral Construct as a Model for Drug Testing and Implantation into Joint Defects. PI and project coordinator: Dr hab. inż. Dorota Kołbuk-Konieczny, Institute of Fundamental Technological Research, PAS
  • PECZIB: Photo-electrochemical Hydrogen Generation Integrated with Photo-chargeable Zinc Ion Battery, PI in the Polish research team: Dr Mykola Pavlenko, Adama Mickiewicz University in Poznań
  • AH-Nano-Cat: Advanced Hybrid Nanomaterials for Efficient Photo(electro)catalytic Water Purification and Hydrogen Production. PI in the Polish research team and project coordinator: Dr Marta Mazurkiewicz-Pawlicka, Warsaw University of Technology

Master grants and grants for formation of new research teams awarded

Thu, 02/27/2025 - 12:00
Kod CSS i JS

7 grants for well-established and outstanding researches and 63 grants for researchers with a PhD degree conferred within 5 to 12 years prior to the proposal submission year have been awarded under MAESTRO and SONATA BIS. The winning applicants will carry out basic research projects with a total value of nearly 235.7 million zlotys.

MAESTRO 14 and SONATA BIS 16 are addressed to researchers experienced in independent academic work who wish to are acquire funds for the most advanced undertakings requiring involvement of many researchers and purchase or manufacturing of research equipment. MAESTRO and SONATA BIS projects can be carried out over a period of 36, 48 or 60 months. There are no caps on funding for single projects and the rationale of the budget is subject to experts’ evaluation. 

MAESTRO funding can be used for pioneering, including interdisciplinary , research significant for the development of science that goes beyond the current state-of-the-art and may result in scientific discoveries. Eligible applicants must be well-established and outstanding researchers with a PhD degree, who have managed at least two research projects funded under national or international calls over the last ten years, published at least five papers in renowned Polish or foreign academic press/ journals and meet the other call requirements (delivered lectures and speeches at conferences, received awards, have been members of associations, etc.).

SONATA BIS aims to support the formation of new research teams to conduct basic research. The latest call was addressed at researchers with a PhD degree conferred between 1 January 2012 and 31 December 2019. Eligible applicants had to demonstrate that their research track record included at least one paper published or accepted for publication and in the case of research in art, at least one paper published or accepted for publication or at least one artistic achievement or achievement in research in art.

69 funding proposals have been submitted to the latest edition of the MAESTRO call, of which 7 received funding: 1 in Humanities, Social Sciences and Art Sciences, 2 in Life Sciences and 4 in Physical Sciences and Engineering. The total funding awarded to the winning proposals amounts to over 29.7 million zlotys. The success rate was 10.14%.

417 proposals were submitted to SONATA BIS 14. Funding was awarded to 63 researches: 13 in Humanities, Social Sciences and Art Sciences, 18 in Life Sciences and 32 in Physical Sciences and Engineering. The total budget was nearly 206 million zlotys and the success rate was 15.11%.

In January 2025, the NCN Council decided to increase the budgets of MAESTRO 16 and SONATY BIS. As a result, more projects can be funded.

RANKING LISTS

MAESTRO 16 Ranking List in pdf format, SONATA BIS 14 Ranking List in pdf format

Evaluation of proposals 

Proposals submitted to MAESTRO and SONATA BIS undergo a two-stage merit-based evaluation performed by expert teams established by the NCN Council.

Firstly, proposals are reviewed by at least two team members acting individually. The team then agrees on the final score and decides whether or not the proposal it is eligible for the next stage. At stage two, proposals are reviewed by at least two (usually foreign) reviewers who are not members of the team. Furthermore, in MAESTRO and SONATA BIS principal investigators are interviewed in English on NCN’s premises. The final score is agreed by the team at the second meeting based on all individual reviews and interview results. The team is responsible for drafting the final ranking lists of proposals recommended for funding and the funding decision is taken by the NCN Director. 

We have to date funded 304 projects with a total value of over 860 million zlotys under MAESTRO. In fourteen SONATA BIS calls, funding of nearly 2.04 billion zlotys went to 1044 researchers.

You can read the descriptions of projects implemented by Polish researchers owing to NCN grants on our website under Przykłady projektów [Funded projects] or on our social media under #projektyNCN #NCNToTlen #ludzieniebudynki #pokolenieNCN.

Delivery of decisions modified 

As of MAESTRO 16 and SONATA BIS 14, decisions by the NCN Director will be delivered to the applicants only and will no longer be communicated to the principal investigators if applicants are entities specified in Article 27 (1) – (7) and Article 27 (9) of the NCN Act. If individuals apply, funding decisions must be delivered to the participating entity specified in the proposal. More on delivery of decisions.

Call for Participation: Your voice on the Future of Work

Wed, 02/26/2025 - 13:00
Kod CSS i JS

Shaping the future of work is one of the four key Partnership Impact Areas which the Social Transformations and Resilience Partnership aims to tackle – how evolving trends will shape employment, skills, and workforce dynamics in the coming years. The Partnership is now developing its Strategic Research and Innovation Agenda (SRIA) to guide future research and policy efforts and create a transformative research and innovation programme.

Anyone interested in the subject (researchers, ministry officials, labour market experts, think-thank representatives, etc.) may fill in the survey. Contribute your insights on the future of work by:

  • Analyzing and validating trends identified through research,
  • Assessing their impact on the future of work, and
  • Identifying any missing trends or overlooked developments.

The survey takes 5–20 minutes, depending on the level of detail you wish to provide. Your responses are anonymous and will directly inform the development of the SRIA. Take the survey here

The survey will be open until 17 March 2025.

Take your chance to contribute to this important initiative. DLR Project Management Agency is in charge of conducting the survey. In case of questions, feel free to contact STR-Foresight@dlr.de !

“The Future of Science is Decided Now,” an interview with the NCN Director

Tue, 02/25/2025 - 14:30
Kod CSS i JS

“We are now at the crossroads. A certain development model of countries such as Poland is coming to an end and new economy engines must be focused on,” says Prof. Krzysztof Jóźwiak. In an interview published in “Forum Akademicke,” he underlines the importance of basic research for the development of competitive economy and pinpoints the shortcomings of the innovation policy to date.

“Recent years have shown that the innovation support strategy has not yielded the expected results,” says Prof. Jóźwiak. He believes that neglecting basic research and focusing on later stages of deployment were the key problems. Modern economy cannot be built without a strong science base. “Basic research is the source of innovation, especially in the 21st century,” he emphasises.

In the interview, the NCN Director refers to the NCN budget which constitutes merely 5% of funds for science. He emphasises that the competitive system of research funding is the best to way to ensure that high-quality projects are submitted. However, he points out that the rate success in NCN calls is rather low which can discourage researchers from applying. The NCN Director points out that “the NCN budget is so low that only one in eight or one in ten projects can be funded, which is very frustrating.”

Moreover, Prof. Jóźwiak addresses the issue of internationalisation of Polish research. He claims that Poland should strive to attract foreign researchers and create an environment for free exchange of ideas. The grant system of the National Science Centre has been appreciated all around the world. However, stable funding and clear career path are vital to attract talent.

According to the NCN Director, science should be pivotal to country’s development strategy. “I have noticed that politicians have recently changed their narrative on science and began to understand the importance of science for the future of Poland. Now is the time to take concrete actions,” Prof. Jóźwiak concludes.

The interview was published on 24 February and is now available on the website of “Forum Akademickie.”

The Neoproterozoic glacial countdown to the biological 'big bang'

Principal Investigator :
dr Ashley Gumsley
University of Silesia

Panel: ST10

Funding scheme : OPUS 10
announced on 15 March 2019 r.

The hospitable environment of the Earth that we know today was born between approximately 780 and 540 million years ago. During this time, the supercontinent of Rodinia had already formed and was beginning to break apart along the equator. During this break up, massive amounts of volcanism were documented, which changed the chemical composition of our atmosphere and oceans. These changes led to a series of glacial periods, of which at least two were global. These global glaciations, however, were critical for the rise of life as we know it today. After the glaciations ended, the oceans were rich in nutrients that allowed life to flourish. As life flourished, the oxygen concentration in the atmosphere increased dramatically, which allowed more and more complex life to develop – a positive feedback. With the increasing oxygen concentrations and the emergence of multi-cellular life, a critical point was reached 541 million years ago: the biological ‘big bang’. This big bang marks when the biological diversity of life increased dramatically. dr Ashley Gumsley, photo Łukasz Beradr Ashley Gumsley, photo Łukasz Bera

This global consensus, however, is not without controversy. Many of the mechanisms which allowed for the build-up of atmospheric oxygen and the development of multi-cellular life, remain poorly understood. One of the keys necessary to understand this controversy better is context through accurate and precise geochronology (i.e., age dating), on key intervals across this time period. This will assist when used in conjunction with other studies on geochemical and geobiological cycles and indicators.

Several areas exist where rocks from this time period are preserved, and one of the best place for rock remnants is in Namibia and South Africa. These remnants include a variety of sedimentary and volcanic rocks. However, many contradictory correlations have been made on the glacial rocks (i.e., diamictites), preserved there. This includes their timing, and whether they are from four, three or two glaciations. Resolving these timings and correlations was the goal of this study, using a combination of mostly geochronological techniques. This is needed, as the four glaciations documented may be the product of structural complexity. This is important, as some of the diamictites are controversially interpreted to have formed before and after the known global glaciations: the Sturtian and Marinoan. This complicates any modelling of the geochemical and geobiological cycles and indicators of the Earth at this time. As diamictites are very diagnostic units, they can be used in the rock record as tracers.

dr Ashley Gumsley, photo Łukasz Beradr Ashley Gumsley, photo Łukasz Bera In this project, it was shown that the existence of this pre-Sturtian glaciation is incorrect. This is due to the remnants of one of these massive magmatic provinces being shown to be quite complex, being composed of multiple events following the same pathways over a protracted time period. It was found to be composed of magmatic conduits varying in age from 1508 million years ago, to 717 million years ago, and other ones emplaced 508 million years ago, highlighting the complexities of using cross-cutting relative age relationships to determine the absolute age of the sedimentary (glacial) units.

Additionally, new, massive magmatic events were also identified within this study, which adds key data on the placement of southern Africa within the supercontinent Gondwana (the successor of Rodinia) during this whole time period, and which will help us resolve the paleogeography from this tumultuous period in time, as well as identify further glacial units elsewhere. 

Project title: Four, three or two? The Neoproterozoic glacial countdown to the biological 'big bang'

dr Ashley Gumsley

Kierownik - dodatkowe informacje

Dr hab, Ashley Gumsley is an assistant professor at the University of Silesia in Katowice since 2019, where he obtained his habilitation in 2024. Before this he worked as an assistant professor at the Institute of Geophysics: Polish Academy of Science in 2018-2019, and obtained his doctorate in 2013-2017 at Lund University in Sweden. His undergraduate career was at the University of Johannesburg in South Africa, which he completed in 2013 while working as an exploration geologist in Botswana and Tanzania, prospecting for gold and copper resources.

dr Ashley Gumsley, photo Łukasz Bera

Podcast 2, 2025: ERC evaluation processes discussed by experts and grant recipients

Tue, 02/18/2025 - 11:00
Kod CSS i JS

What determines ERC call success? What does the ERC evaluation process entail and how does it differ from our domestic approach? These issues are discussed by our guests today, Prof. Grażyna Jurkowlaniec and Prof. Ewelina Knapska.

Our new podcast episode hosted by Anna Korzekwa-Józefowicz features a discussion on the ERC evaluation of grant proposals and strategies to increase researchers’ chances of success.

Prof. Grażyna Jurkowlaniec, photo M. Kaźmierczak/UWProf. Grażyna Jurkowlaniec, photo M. Kaźmierczak/UW Prof. Grażyna Jurkowlaniec from the Faculty of Culture and Arts, University of Warsaw, studies art and art historiography from late Medieval to Early Modern period. She is the Chair of the Foundation for Polish Science’s Council and former member of the board of the National Program for the Humanities (Narodowy Program Rozwoju Humanistyki, NPHR”). She is also a former winner of three NCN grants. As part of the SAIGA project (ERC Advanced) she has analysed the relationship between the research on the fauna of Eastern European and the ways in which the region was perceived in the Early Modern period. Prof. Ewelina Knapska is a neuroscientist from the Nenecki Institute of Experimental Biology, PAS, who researchers emotions and how they are socially transmitted. She is the Head of the Laboratory of Emotions Neurobiology and Co-Head of the MAB Brain City. She is also a former recipient of NCN Grants and ERC Starting Grant (2016) for a project on how the amygdala controls emotions.

Expert researchers on the evaluation process

Both scientists are former members of the ERC review panels. In our podcast, they are talking about their experience as grant recipients and experts, and explore what makes a grant proposal successful. 

Prof. Jurkowlaniec says that “a proposal must be ambitious, bold and must go beyond the conventional approach.” “My experience shows that a research project in humanities is often thought to be nothing more but an outline of a monograph, whereas the ERC requires a wider and more comprehensive approach. Not just a table of contents of a future monograph,” she adds.

According to Prof. Knapska, many proposals are simply not bold enough in their hypotheses and extent, which is their main problem. “I often read and comment on proposals when requested to do so and have noticed that they are just too conservative. As a panel member I know that they will be rejected at the first stage,” she adds.

She stresses that the key is to properly define a research problem. “A significant research question must be posed and one must not be afraid to take a bold approach. A project  should bring new insights in a specialisation as well as entire research field,” she says.

General quality of proposals

The experts were asked about the general quality of evaluated proposals.  dr hab. Ewelina Knapska, prof. IBD PAN, photo One HD dla FNPdr hab. Ewelina Knapska, prof. IBD PAN, photo One HD dla FNP

Prof. Knapska says that “in some countries, where the ERC is regarded as an additional source of funding, preselection takes place when one decides to apply. But there are also countries where funding for research is very modest and researchers have no choice but to try their luck at the ERC. Italian researches, for example, apply to the ERC because they have no other choice.”

The second stage of evaluation is yet another story. “At this stage, we nearly always deal with excellent proposals, so it is incredibly difficult to choose the best ones. It is so hard to take the final decision because we are choosing from the very top proposals,” Prof. Knapska says.

A proposal is not a school essay

The ERC rewards boldness, originality and determination. The scientists advise that one must not give up after the first unsuccessful submission of a grant proposal but emphasise that applicants must not correct their proposals by addressing the reviewers’ feedback only. “Researchers often improve their proposals like an essay at school and address nothing more but the reviewer’s feedback. This is a mistake,” says Prof. Jurkowlaniec. “You can never be sure that your proposal will be re-evaluated by the same persons, while new reviewers may have completely different feedback. Instead of addressing every single feedback, one should thoroughly consider which modifications are crucial and which result from the reviewer’s current view. Scientists must be certain that their ideas are valuable, otherwise it is probably better to wait a couple of years and draft a new proposal.”  

This view is shared by Prof. Knapska who claims that “one must not give up on the first rejection or correct their proposal automatically,” and “the best way is to thoroughly analyse the feedback and decide what needs to be modified. A new approach and fresh interpretation can be the key to successful submission in the future.”

You can listen to the entire discussion in our latest podcast available on Spotify, Apple Podcast and You Tube, where automatic transcription is also available.

We have discussed the NCN evaluation procedure in:

Podcast 2, 2023. How to evaluate proposals  

Podcast 3, 2024. How to evaluate proposals, part 2

You can also read an interview with Piotr Sankowski and Artur Obłuski, NCN and ERC grant winners, in which they talk about perseverance in their quest for funding.

CHIST-ERA Call 2025 SOL

Mon, 02/17/2025 - 16:00
Kod CSS i JS

The National Science Centre, in cooperation collaboration with the CHIST-ERA network, has launched the call “Science in Your Own Language” for international research projects on the automatic translation of scientific knowledge in order to overcome language and cultural barriers.  

The call aims at promoting multilingualism among science and technology producers and users and is open to funding proposals in one or more of the following areas:

  • Machine translation of scientific knowledge to and from different languages including the translation of research metadata and data where applicable, documents, protocols, paper and project reviews, other academic or technical outputs such as outreach materials and press releases, blogs and other web-based content.
  • Design of tools for seamless and interoperable access to multilingual scientific and technology data hubs and repositories for stakeholders who chose to approach and use them in their own language.
  • Tools for multilingual detection of scientific frauds and plagiarism.

Funding proposals may be submitted by international consortia composed of at least three, and no more than six, research teams from at least three countries participating in the call, i.e. Belgium, Estonia, Finland, France, Ireland, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Poland, Slovakia, Spain, Switzerland, Taiwan, and the United Kingdom. 

The principal investigator of the Polish research team must hold at least a PhD degree. The project budget may cover salaries for members of the research team, salaries and scholarships for students and PhD students, purchase or manufacturing of research equipment and other costs crucial to the research project. The total funding allocated for the Polish research teams under the call is 750 thousand euro. 

This is a one-stage call, which means that a full joint proposal (in English) must be drafted at international level and submitted by 15 April 2025, 5 pm CEST. Polish research teams must also submit an NCN proposal concerning the Polish part of the project, by 22 April 2025.

Only joint proposals are subject to an eligibility check performed by an international team of experts specialising in the call subject. The call will be concluded in July 2025.

An information webinar for researchers willing to take part in the call will be held on 27 February. Registration

Teams seeking for cooperating partners can use the Partner Search Tool.

Call Text for Polish research teams

Call Text on the CHIST-ERA website

CHIST-ERA Call 2025 SOL

Kod CSS i JS

17 February 2025

The National Science Centre (NCN), in cooperation with the CHIST-ERA network, is pleased to announce the call Science in your own language (CHIST-ERA SOL) for the international research project on the automatic translation of scientific knowledge in order to overcome language and cultural barriers.

The call aims at promoting multilingualism among science and technology producers and users and is open to funding proposals in one or more of the following areas:

  • Machine translation of scientific knowledge to and from different languages including the translation of research metadata and data where applicable, documents, protocols, paper and project reviews, other academic or technical outputs such as outreach materials and press releases, blogs and other web-based content.
  • Design of tools for seamless and interoperable access to multilingual scientific and technology data hubs and repositories for stakeholders who chose to approach and use them in their own language. Tools should be demonstrated by application to sectoral use cases.
  • Tools for multilingual detection of scientific frauds and plagiarism.

Funding proposals may be submitted by international consortia composed of at least three, and no more than six, research teams from at least three countries participating in the call. The principal investigator of the Polish research team must hold at least a PhD degree.

Countries participating in the call: Belgium, Estonia, Finland, France, Ireland, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Poland, Slovakia, Spain, Switzerland, Taiwan, and the United Kingdom.

The application procedure:

  • International level: joint proposals are drafted by Polish research teams in cooperation with the foreign partners (in English) and submitted to the electronic submission system of the CHIST-ERA network (ESS).
  • National level: NCN proposals concerning the Polish part of the project are drafted by Polish research teams and submitted to the NCN electronically via the OSF submission system within 7 days of the date by which joint proposals must be submitted at international level.

This is a one-stage call, which means that only full joint proposals are submitted at international level. More on the application procedure at international level can be found in the call text available on the website of the CHIST-ERA network.

Call timeline:

  • Submission deadline for the joint proposals in the ESS system: 15 April 2025, 17:00 CEST
  • Submission deadline for the NCN proposals in OSF system: 22 April 2025
  • Call results: July 2025
  • Expected project start date: November 2025.

Under the CHIST-ERA SOL call, funds can be applied for to cover salaries for members of the research team, salaries and scholarships for students and PhD students, purchase or manufacturing of research equipment and other costs crucial to the research project.

The total funding allocated by the NCN for research tasks to be performed by the Polish research teams under the call is 750 000 EUR.

Please read further:

  • The call documents available on the website of the CHIST-ERA network (for all applicants in the call).
  • The information for applicants below and all attachments hereto (only for researchers applying for NCN funding).

Show all

Hide all«

Who may apply for NCN funding?

Proposals in the call may be submitted by entities specified in the Act on the National Science Centre, i.e.:

  1. universities;
  2. federations of science and HE entities;
  3. research institutes of the Polish Academy of Sciences operating pursuant to the Act on the Polish Academy of Sciences of 30 April 2010 (Journal of Laws of 2020, item 1796, as amended);
  4. research institutes operating pursuant to the Act on Research Institutes of 30 April 2010 (Journal of Laws 2020, item 1383, as amended);
  5. international research institutes established pursuant to other acts and acting in the Republic of Poland:

5a. Łukasiewicz Centre operating pursuant to the Act on the Łukasiewicz Research Network of 21 February 2019 (Journal of Laws 2020, item 2098);

5b. institutes operating within the Łukasiewicz Research Network;

  1. Polish Academy of Arts and Sciences;
  2. other entities involved in research independently on a continuous basis (other than set forth in sections 1-6);
  3. groups of entities (at least two entities mentioned in sections 1-7 or at least one institution as such together with at least one company);
  4. scientific and industrial centres laid down in the Act on Research Centres of 30 April 2010 (Journal of Laws 2020, item 1383, as amended);
  5. research centres of the Polish Academy of Sciences laid down in the Act on the Polish Academy of Sciences of 30 April 2010 (Journal of Laws 2020, item 1796);
  6. scientific libraries;
  7. companies operating as research and development centres laid down in the Act on Certain Forms of Support for Innovation Activities of 30 May 2008 (Journal of Laws 2021, item 706);
  8. legal entities with registered office in Poland:

13a. President of the Central Office of Measures;

  1. natural persons;
  2. companies conducting research in other organisational form than set forth in sections 1-13a.

If research projects are carried out by two or more Polish partners applying for NCN funding, they must set up a group of entities (see item 8 above) and as such submit NCN proposals. NCN proposals are submitted by a leader named in the research project cooperation agreement concluded by the group of entities. An institution employing the principal investigator acts as the leader of the group of entities. A template agreement on the formation of a group of entities for the purposes of completion of the research project can be found here.

If, pursuant to Article 27 (1) (2) of the NCN Act, Polish entities cannot set up a group of entities, they are not eligible to apply for NCN funding of a joint research project.

Who may act as a principal investigator?

The principal investigator of the Polish research team must hold at least a PhD degree at the proposal submission date. Restrictions on submitting NCN proposals are laid down in Chapter IV of the Terms and regulations on awarding funding for research tasks funded or co-funded under international calls launched by the National Science Centre and carried out as multilateral collaboration UNISONO.

What are the topics covered by the call?

The call aims at promoting multilingualism among science and technology producers and users and is open to funding proposals in one or more of the following areas:

  • Machine translation of scientific knowledge to and from different languages including the translation of research metadata and data where applicable, documents, protocols, paper and project reviews, other academic or technical outputs such as outreach materials and press releases, blogs and other web-based content.
  • Design of tools for seamless and interoperable access to multilingual scientific and technology data hubs and repositories for stakeholders who chose to approach and use them in their own language. Tools should be demonstrated by application to sectoral use cases.
  • Tools for multilingual detection of scientific frauds and plagiarism.

Funded projects are expected to significantly advance the state-of-the-art by achieving one or more of the following objectives:

  • Open science to citizens and society.
  • Take on board all research works independently of their language.
  • Increase the value of research and research driven products and services by facilitating regional or national targeted impacts.
  • Increase the visibility of scientific results, irrespective of the language used to report them.
  • Make creativity and reasoning in research benefit from all language subtleties.
  • Design and implement demonstrations of new approaches to knowledge access both through novel modelling of data structures and software oriented to meet new criteria for accessibility policies.

More information on the subject of the call can be found in the call text available on the website of the CHIST-ERA network.

Polish researchers may apply for NCN funding for their basic research projects as defined in the Article 2 (1) of the NCN Act.

NCN proposals comprising research tasks overlapping with research tasks laid down in another proposal that has been already submitted in any NCN call or with respect to which an appeal has been initiated, can only be submitted once the funding decision has become final.

What is the project duration?

Research projects may be planned for a period of either 24 or 36 months.

What are the positions for members of the research team?

Apart from the principal investigator, research tasks may be performed by co-investigators, including students, PhD students and post-docs.

A post-doc type position is a full-time position, scheduled by the project’s principal investigator for a person who has been conferred a PhD degree within 12 years before 1 January of the year of employment in the project. This period may be extended pursuant to the Types of costs in research projects funded by the National Science Centre under international calls carried out as multilateral collaboration UNISONO.

Persons employed as post-docs must have their PhD degree awarded by another institution than the one employing them at this post or must have completed a continuous and evidenced post-doctoral fellowship of at least 10 months in another institution than the host institution for the project and in another country than the one in which they have been conferred a PhD degree. Persons employed as post-docs in the project must be recruited in an open call procedure.

PhD students who are NCN scholarship grantees must be recruited in an open call procedure.

An international expert team will review the relevance of involvement of particular members of the research team in the project. The competences and tasks to be performed by particular members of the research team must be described in the proposal. For more information on the budget for salaries and scholarships, please read the Types of costs in research projects funded by the National Science Centre under international calls carried out as multilateral collaboration UNISONO.

The terms of the call do not specify the maximum number of research team members.

Post-docs and scholarship grantees must not be named in either joint or NCN proposals.

How should the budget be planned?

The project budget must be justified as regards the subject and scope of research and based on realistic calculations. The budget must include expenditures eligible for funding from NCN resources (the so-called eligible costs).

The terms of the call do not specify the minimum or maximum (total) funds that may be requested.

The budget in NCN proposals must be quoted in PLN, while the budget in joint proposals in EUR. The EUR budget for the Polish part of the research project in the joint proposal must be calculated according to the following exchange rate: EUR 1 = PLN 4.2073.

The project budget (eligible costs) includes direct and indirect costs.

Direct costs include:

  1. remuneration for the principal investigator;
  2. remuneration for co-investigators in the project:
    • full-time remuneration for post-docs,
    • salaries and scholarships for students and PhD students,
    • the so-called additional remuneration for members of the research team. If the principal investigator is not to be employed full-time in the project, their remuneration is paid from the pool allocated for additional remuneration;
  3. purchase of research equipment, devices and software;
  4. purchase of material and small equipment;
  5. outsourced services;
  6. business trips, visits and consultations;
  7. compensation for collective investigators and
  8. other costs crucial to the project according to the Types of costs in research projects funded by the National Science Centre under international calls carried out as multilateral collaboration UNISONO.

Indirect costs include:

  • indirect costs up to 20% of direct costs, which may be spent on costs that are related indirectly to the research project, including the cost of open access to publications and research data,
  • indirect cost up to 2% of direct costs to be spent on open access, which may be designated only for the cost of open access to publications or research data.

During the project implementation, the host institution must agree with the principal investigator the coverage of at least 25% of the indirect costs. Any expenditure made from that amount must meet the eligibility criteria laid down in the Terms and regulations on awarding funding for research tasks funded or co-funded under international calls launched by the National Science Centre and carried out as multilateral collaboration UNISONO.

Where unjustified costs are planned, the proposal may be rejected.

We recommend that Polish applicants should consult the budget table of the Polish part of the project with the NCN. The budget table in .xlsx format should be sent to alicja.dylag@ncn.gov.pl by 3 April 2025.

Open access publication of research results

Pursuant to the NCN Open Access Policy, all research results must be made available in full and immediate open access.

The Open Access Policy does not apply to monographs, monograph chapters and peer-reviewed collected works.

NCN recognizes the following publication routes as compliant with the policy:

  1. publication in open access journals and on open access platforms registered, or with pending registration, in the Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ);
  2. publication in subscription journals or hybrid journals, as long as the VoR, AAM or preprint of a paper (if AAM and VoR are embargoed) is deposited in a repository registered in the OpenDOAR database immediately upon the article’s publication on the publisher’s website. If a preprint is published, AAM of the same paper must also be deposited in the repository;
  3. publication in journals covered by an open access licence within the framework of so-called transformative agreements that must be inscribed in the Efficiency and Standards for Article Charges registry (ESAC-Registry) as long as the article has been accepted for publication or published before 31 December 2025 (Letter of the NCN Director of 15 December 2024 extending route 3 of the transformation agreements under the NCN’s Open Access Policy).

Papers must be published using the following licences:

  • for full open access journals (route 1), a CC 4.0 licence;
  • for subscription journals or hybrid journals (route 2), preprint must be deposited in the repository using CC BY 4.0 licence upon the article’s online publication on the publisher’s website. Once the embargo period is over, AAM of the same paper must also be deposited in the repository. The NCN does not impose any licence-related restrictions for AAM version upon the embargo period;
  • for journals covered by transformative agreements (route 3), the following licences can be used: CC BY 4.0; CC BY-SA 4.0 or CC BY-ND 4.0.

Eligibility of Article Processing Charges:

  • route 1: costs are eligible as long as the CC BY 4.0 or CC BY-ND 4.0 licences are used;
  • route 2: costs are not eligible and must not be covered by NCN funds;
  • route 3: costs are eligible as long as the CC BY 4.0, CC BY-SA 4.0 or CC BY-ND 4.0 licences are used.

The data underpinning the scientific publications resulting from the project funded by the NCN must be well-documented pursuant to the standards of the machine or manual Findability, Accessibility, Interoperability or Reusability (the so-called “FAIR Data”). Where possible, data must be made available in the repository, according to the Creative Commons Public Domain (CC0) licence or Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) licence. Other licences can also be used as long as they ensure an equivalent level of data openness as CC0 or CC BY 4.0.

Can proposals in this call include application for state aid?

State aid can be requested under the call. More about state aid can be found here.

What is the proposal evaluation procedure?

Joint proposals are subject to an eligibility check performed by the NCN, other agencies participating in the call, and the Secretariat of the CHIST-ERA network.

Joint proposals that have passed the eligibility check are subject to a merit-based evaluation carried out by an international expert team pursuant to the terms set forth in the call text.

NCN proposals are subject solely to an NCN eligibility check carried out by the Scientific Coordinators.

The eligibility check of NCN proposals involves verification of proposal for completeness, compliance with all terms set forth in the call documents and Terms and regulations on awarding funding for research tasks funded or co-funded under international calls launched by the National Science Centre and carried out as multilateral collaboration UNISONO.

The information provided in NCN proposals and in joint proposals must be consistent and joint proposals annexed to NCN proposals must be the same as joint proposals submitted at international level.

Who performs the merit-based evaluation of proposals?

Only joint proposals are subject to a merit-based evaluation performed by an international expert team established by the CHIST-ERA network. For more information on the evaluation of proposals, please go to the call text available at the website of the CHIST-ERA network.

When and how will the results be announced?

The CHIST-ERA SOL call will be concluded in July 2025. Firstly, project coordinators will be notified of the outcome. Polish research teams will be notified of the results by way of a decision of the NCN Director.

In the event of a breach of the call procedure or other formal infringements related to actions performed by the NCN, the applicants may lodge an appeal against the decision of the NCN Director with the Committee of Appeals of the NCN Council.

Where can additional information be found?

For more information on the call, please go to the website of the CHIST-ERA network. The terms and regulations on awarding NCN funding in the call are set forth here.

Should you have any questions or queries, please contact us by phone or by e-mail:

12 ******* Show number
004********** Show number

(between 9:00 and 12:00)

Useful information

If you are intending to apply to the CHIST-ERA SOL call, please read the call documents, in particular:

  1. Call text available on the website of the CHIST-ERA network.
  2. Terms and regulations on awarding funding for research tasks funded or co-funded under international calls launched by the National Science Centre and carried out as multilateral collaboration UNISONO.

Before an NCN proposal is submitted to the NCN, please:

  1. gather the data necessary to complete the proposal from the applicant and find out about the internal procedures that may affect the proposal and project performance (project costs, procedure for acquiring signature(s) of authorised representative(s) of the institution to confirm submission of the proposal); if a group of Polish entities applies for funding, draft a research project cooperation agreement;
  2. make sure that the information in and annexes to the proposal are correct. Checking the proposal for completeness in OSF with the “Sprawdź kompletność” [“Check completeness”] button does not guarantee that all information entered is correct and the required annexes have been attached;
  3. make sure that respective tabs are completed in the correct language;
  4. disable the final version of the proposal to the NCN;
  5. download the confirmation of proposal submission which must be signed by the principal investigator and authorised representative(s) of the host institution.

Once the proposal has been completed and the required annexes attached, use the “Wyślij do NCN” [“Send to NCN”] button to submit the proposal to the NCN electronically via the OSF submission system.

Once the call for proposals has been closed:

  1. proposals will be evaluated;
  2. if a proposal is recommended for funding, a funding agreement will be entered into;
  3. the project will be performed pursuant to the funding agreement and Terms and regulations on awarding funding for research tasks funded or co-funded under international calls launched by the National Science Centre and carried out as multilateral collaboration UNISONO;

In the event of a breach of the call procedure or other formal infringements related to actions performed by the NCN, applicants may appeal against the decision of the NCN Director with the Committee of Appeals of the NCN Council within 14 days of the effective delivery of the decision.
 

Call documents

CHIST-ERA network:

The call documents applicable to all applicants are available on the website of the CHIST-ERA Network.

Narodowe Centrum Nauki:

  1. Terms and regulations on awarding funding for research tasks funded or co-funded under international calls launched by the National Science Centre and carried out as multilateral collaboration UNISONO
  2. Budget table of the Polish research team
  3. NCN Panels
  4. Regulations for awarding scholarships in NCN-funded research projects
  5. NCN proposal form template
  6. Research project cooperation agreement (mandatory for a group of entities; in Polish)
  7. State aid
  8. Guidelines for applicants to complete NCN proposals in the OSF submission system
  9. NCN proposal submission procedure in OSF
  10. Guidelines for applicants to complete the data management plan form in the proposal
  11. Guidelines for applicants to complete the ethics issues form in the proposal
  12. NCN’ Open Access Policy
  13. Code of the National Science Centre on research integrity and applying for research funding
  14. NCN’s position on collaboration with the Russian Federation within the framework of NCN-funded grants

Documents concerning evaluation of proposals:

  1. Service of decisions of the NCN Director
  2. Guidelines for appealing against the NCN Director’s decisions

Documents to be read before starting an NCN project:

  1. Agreement template (draft version that may be amended when the agreement is signed with the NCN; in Polish)
  2. Order establishing a procedure for auditing undertakings selected in the calls funded by the National Science Centre
  3. Guidelines for entities auditing the implementation of research projects funded by the National Science Centre
  4. Information on personal data processing

Dioscuri Centres in Poland five years later

Thu, 02/13/2025 - 10:00
Kod CSS i JS

It is the fifth anniversary of the first two Dioscuri Centres for Scientific Excellence in Poland. Forum Akademickie featured an interview with Aleksandra Pękowska and Grzegorz Sumara, Dioscuri Centre leaders, who discussed the work conditions in Poland, achievements and plans for the next five years.

Dioscuri is a programme devised by the Maxa Planck Society (MPG) to support the development of scientific excellence centres in Central and Eastern Europe by promoting outstanding researchers who want to conduct their top-notch research in this region. Owing to the programme, eight early-stage researchers have returned to Poland to establish eight Dioscuri Centres modelled on the world’s best solutions, in cooperation with the German mentoring institutions. 

The first two Dioscuri Centres were launched in the Nenecki Institute, PAS in the late 2019 and early 2020. Dr Aleksandra Pękowska has been appointed head of the Dioscuri Centre for Chromatin Biology and Epigenomics and the Centre for Metabolic Diseases has been headed by Dr hab. Grzegorz Sumar. Pursuant to the programme, both centres have recently been funded to continue their operation for the next five years.

“Dioscuri grants provide the resources needed for salaries, research and publications. Because it is easy to transfer funds from one budget item to another, top specialists can be recruited and lab needs rearranged during the project. We can use more dynamic research group management methods adopted by the top U.S. institutions,” they say, adding that “the grant extension have obviously allowed us to believe in a more stable development perspective, which – in turn – made us engage in more ambitious and challenging projects that have already resulted in publications in prestigious academic press/ journals, such as Cell Stem Cell, Genes & Develoment, EMBO Molecular Medicine or EMBO Reports.”

They have also pointed out a widely-understood environment affecting the conditions of work in Poland and complementary role of domestic grant programmes in the operation of the Dioscuri centres. 

“The dynamic operation of the National Science Centre has been an unquestionable asset and incentive for our return to Poland,” Aleksandra Pękowska and Grzegorz Sumara point out, adding that “the NCN is currently the main basic research funding agency in Poland that supports high quality solutions, introducing the best Western standards to Poland while, at the same time, promoting and nurturing cooperation between national and international research institutions.” 

In their summing up of five years of Dioscuri Centres’ operation in Poland, the scientists highlight the importance of decent funding for the National Science Centre as well as urgent and comprehensive improvement of the researcher and research institution support and evaluation system. The whole text is available on the website of Forum Akademickie.

In July 2024, the German-Polish Action Plan” was signed by the governments of Poland and Germany to strengthen closer cooperation in social and economic life. In the science section of the document, the signatories expressed their wish to “provide a strong foundation for science, research and innovation through joint investment in order to secure prosperity, competitive strength and the technological sovereignty of Poland, Germany and Europe,” and the Dioscuri Centres were referred to as “setting the benchmark for scientific excellence, promote brain circulation within Europe and develop the “European Research Area” further.”

Dioscuri call winners:

ROS-Scavenging Magnetic Nanozymes

Principal Investigator :
dr hab. Anna Haduch
Maj Institute of Pharmacology Polish Academy of Sciences

Panel: NZ5

Funding scheme : M-ERA
announced on 1 March 2023

Alzheimer’s disease is one of the toughest conundrums facing contemporary medicine. Affecting millions of people worldwide, this mysterious, progressive neurodegenerative process, which represents the most common cause of dementia in the world, still remains largely unexplained. Its main triggers are known to be amyloid beta (Aβ) peptides and abnormal (hyperphosphorylated) Tau proteins, which build up in the brain in the form of harmful plaques and gradually destroy precious neuronal structures, leading to the gradual loss of memory and cognitive function.

dr hab. Anna Haduch, photo Łukasz Beradr hab. Anna Haduch, photo Łukasz Bera Our innovative solution to the problem was to enlist an army of invisible guardians that could be sent into action to defend the brain against damage with surgical precision. This is the chief mission of ROSSCA, a project that attempts to harness the physics of nanotechnology for medicine in order to develop a safe and effective weapon against the menacing forces of Alzheimer’s disease.

At the centre of the story are nanozymes, or small nanomolecules that behave like specialised natural enzymes. We could picture them as minuscule slivers of intelligent material, activated by an external magnetic field, which can be deployed to wherever they are needed in order to neutralise dangerous reactive oxygen species (ROS) and mechanically break down harmful Aβ and Tau plaques. This creates an incredible opportunity to influence the biochemical equilibrium in the brain and help restore affected neurons to normal activity.

The project is built upon close cooperation within an international team of experts in various fields, including physics and materials science, biology, toxicology, pharmacology and neurobiology, who are working on the following four tasks:

1. Creating and controlling nanozymes: Scientists at the University of Zaragoza (UNIZAR) are developing nanozymes that mimic the activity of the natural defensive enzymes present in our body (such as SOD, GPx, CAT). In addition, they are also building a special portable magnetic field MNZ activator, which will be used for the precise activation of nanozymes at a selected site and time.

2. Safety first: Scientists at the National Institute of Biology (NIB) in Ljubljana are testing whether nanozymes are safe for human cells, using 3D models to get more accurate results and increase the odds that the new treatment will be safe and free from adverse side effects.

3. Test tube tests – in vitro testing: Scientists at the University of São Paulo (USP) are running experiments on cell line models of Alzheimer’s disease to study the impact of nanozymes on cell health, metabolism and the presence of key biomarkers in search for any signs of improvement.

4. Testing on live organisms: Scientists at the Institute of Pharmacology of the Polish Academy of Sciences (IF-PAN) inject rats showing symptoms like those of Alzheimer’s with nanozymes. They are using precise magnetic activation and intranasal administration methods to see whether they can stop the disease and improve the rats’ cognitive function.

Thanks to its interdisciplinary approach and cutting-edge technologies, ROSSCA is likely to turn a new chapter in the history of our fight against neurodegenerative conditions. Let’s imagine a future in which closely controlled nanozymes are able to slow down or even stop the progression of Alzheimer’s disease, restoring hope to patients and their families. Our groundbreaking research shows how far science has come and how much further it can still go if we work together to combine our passion and knowledge.

Project title: Zdalnie aktywowane nanozymy magnetyczne wyłapujące reaktywne formy tlenu w chorobie Alzheimera

dr hab. Anna Haduch

Kierownik - dodatkowe informacje

Dr hab. n. med. Anna Haduch, graduate of the Jagiellonian University, heads the Department of Pharmacokinetics and Drug Metabolism at the Institute of Pharmacology of the Polish Academy of Sciences in Kraków. She is passionate about studying the role of cytochrome P450 enzymes in the biotransformation of drugs and neural substrates in order to push the frontier of what we know about brain metabolism. Dr Haduch is the author of many publications in renowned scientific journals and an active member of the international research community, working on projects that might change the face of modern medicine.

dr hab. Anna Haduch, photo Łukasz Bera