SONATINA 8

Kod CSS i JS

15 December 2023

The National Science Centre (NCN) is launching the SONATINA 8 call for research projects. The objective of the call is to support the career development of early-stage researchers by creating opportunities for full-time employment and research in Poland and enabling them to gain knowledge and experience during fellowships in first-rate foreign research institutions.

The call is addressed at individuals who have been granted their PhD degree in the proposal submission year or within 3 years prior to the proposal submission year (between 1 January 2021 and 31 December 2023) or will be granted their PhD by 30 June 2024. The 3-year period may be extended by the career breaks laid down in the Resolution.

Employment under a full-time employment contract must be planned for the principal investigator in the host institution for the project other than the one from which the principal investigator has earned a PhD degree. The principal investigator must complete a foreign fellowship of 3 to 6 months in a foreign research institution.

The Council of the National Science Centre has allocated PLN 20,000,000 for research projects to be carried out under the SONATINA 8 call for proposals.

Proposals must be submitted electronically via the OSF submission system available at: https://osf.opi.org.pl pursuant to the proposal submission procedure.

The call for proposals in the OSF submission system closes on 15 March 2024, 4 p.m. CET.

Please read the call documents provided in this call text.

Please note: As of the calls launched on 15 December 2023, project literature SHALL NOT count towards the page limit in the short and full project descriptions.

Please note: Due to the Russian invasion of Ukraine, the NCN Council has decided that proposals submitted to NCN calls must not provide for any collaboration between Polish and Russian entities. Proposals providing for such collaboration shall be rejected as ineligible.

Show all»

Hide all«

Who is eligible to apply?

Proposals for funding of a research project under SONATINA 8 may be submitted by entities laid down in the Act on the National Science Centre (“NCN”), hereinafter referred to as the “applicants”, for which project funding does not constitute state aid, i.e.:

  1. universities,
  2. federations of science and HE entities,
  3. research institutes of the Polish Academy of Sciences operating pursuant to the Act on the Polish Academy of Sciences of 30 April 2010 (Journal of Laws of 2020, item 1796, as amended),
  4. research institutes operating pursuant to the Act on Research Institutes of 30 April 2010 (Journal of Laws of 2020, item 1383, as amended),
  5. international research institutes established pursuant to other acts and acting in the Republic of Poland,

5a. Łukasiewicz Centre operating pursuant to the Act on the Łukasiewicz Research Network of 21 February 2019 (Journal of Laws of 2020, item 2098),

5b. institutes operating within the Łukasiewicz Research Network,

  1. Polish Academy of Arts and Sciences,
  2. other entities involved in research independently on a continuous basis,
  3. groups of entities (at least two entities mentioned in sections 1-7 or at least one institution as such together with at least one company),
  4. scientific and industrial centres laid down in the Act on Research Institutes of 30 April 2010 (Journal of Laws of 2020, items 1383, as amended),
  5. research centres of the Polish Academy of Sciences laid down in the Act on the Polish Academy of Sciences of 30 April 2010 (Journal of Laws of 2020, item 1796),
  6. scientific libraries,
  7. companies operating as R&D centres within the meaning of the Act on Certain Forms of Support for Innovative Activity of 30 May 2008 (Journal of Laws of 2021, item 706),
  8. legal entities with registered office in Poland,

13a. President of the Central Office of Measures, and

  1. natural persons.

Who can act as the principal investigator?

Principal investigators must be individuals who meet both of the following conditions:

  • have earned a PhD degree in the proposal submission year or within 3 years prior to the proposal submission year (between 1 January 2021 and 31 December 2023) or will earn a PhD degree by 30 June 2024. The 3-year period may be extended by the career breaks laid down in the Resolution
  • will be employed in the research project pursuant to a full-time employment contract, on terms and conditions laid down in the Regulations, for the research project performance period. They must be employed by another institution than the one from which they have earned their PhD degree.

Are there any restrictions on submitting proposals?

Restrictions on submitting proposals are described in Chapter III of the Regulations.

One can act as the principal investigator under a SONATINA call only once.

What are the subjects covered by the call?

The project must cover either basic research or applied research.

Proposals may be submitted to the call in any of 26 NCN review panels, within three areas:

  • HS – Arts, Humanities and Social Sciences;
  • ST – Physical Sciences and Engineering;
  • NZ – Life Sciences.

What is the project duration?

Research projects may be planned for a period of either 24 or 36 months.

What is the foreign fellowship duration?

Foreign fellowships may last between 3 to 6 months.

How should the project budget be planned?

The project budget must be justified as regards the subject and scope of research and based on realistic calculations. No maximum or minimum amount of the project budget has been set for SONATINA 8. If an unjustified budget is planned, the proposal may be rejected.

The project budget includes direct costs and indirect costs.

Direct costs include:

  • remuneration for the principal investigator,
  • cost of principal investigator’s mandatory foreign fellowship,
  • remuneration for co-investigators in the project, the so-called additional remuneration,
  • purchase of materials and small equipment,
  • outsourced services,
  • business trips, visits and consultations (applies to costs other than obligatory foreign fellowship) ,
  • compensation for collective investigators and
  • other costs crucial to the research project which comply with the Types of costs in research projects funded by the National Science Centre.

The project budget must not include the funds for the purchase or manufacturing of research equipment, devices or software.

Please note: The costs of publication of monographs (as defined in §10 of the Regulation on Evaluation of the Quality of Research Activity passed by the Minister of Science and Higher Education on 22 February 2019 (Journal of Laws of 2019, item 392) resulting from research projects may only be incurred following a positive review by the NCN.

Indirect costs include:

Under SONATINA 8, funds must be planned for:

  1. employment of the principal investigator pursuant to a full-time employment contract for the research project performance period, in accordance with the Regulations;
  2. research projects, in accordance with the budget laid down in the proposal; and
  3. principal investigator’s foreign fellowship at the foreign research institution of his choice, covering:

a) flat-rate funds to cover the applicant’s living expenses at a foreign research institution hosting the fellowship, multiplied by the percentage correction rate set for a given country:

  • PLN 12,000 per each month of the fellowship,
  • PLN 3,000 per each month of stay at the fellowship location:

(i) of a minor child of the principal investigator or under legal guardianship of the principal investigator or

(ii) of the guardian of the principal investigator if the principal investigator is a holder of a certificate of severe or moderate disability,

b) flat-rate funds to cover the return travel expenses:

  • PLN 1,000 to PLN 10,000, depending on the distance between the participating entity and the research institution hosting the fellowship.

Please note that only the principal investigator may be employed with remuneration paid from the pool allocated for full-time salaries. Full-time salaries for post-docs, senior researchers and special auxiliary post holders must not be planned under SONATINA.

NCN scholarships and doctoral scholarships must not be planned under SONATINA.

Additional remuneration can be used to cover salaries for students and PhD students.

Please note: The cost of open access to publications subject to the NCN’s Open Access Policy must not be planned as direct costs.

Can proposals in this call include application for state aid?

State aid cannot be applied for under the call. For more information, please refer to the State Aid section.

What should be included in a proposal?

Required information and annexes are laid down in §6 of the Annex to Resolution No 104/2023 of 9 November 2023.

The proposal form is available here.

Please note: As of the calls launched on 15 December 2023, project literature SHALL NOT count towards the page limit in the short and full project descriptions.

What is the proposal evaluation procedure?

Proposals are subject to an eligibility check and merit-based evaluation.

The eligibility check is performed by the scientific coordinators. Only complete proposals that meet all the requirements set forth in the call text may be recommended for merit-based evaluation. Proposals may also be rejected as not eligible at the stage of merit-based evaluation.

The merit-based evaluation of proposals is performed in two stages.

Stage I: Proposals are evaluated by the Expert Team established by the NCN based on the data included in the proposal and annexes thereto, with the exception of the full project description. First, each proposal is evaluated by two members of the Expert Team acting independently. In the case of a proposal which is assigned an auxiliary NCN review panel specifying disciplines covered by NCN review panels other than the one to which the proposal was submitted, the Chair of the Expert Team may decide to request another review from a member of another Expert Team (the so-called interdisciplinary proposals).

Then, at the first meeting, the Expert Team discusses all proposals and compiles a list of proposals approved for stage II of evaluation.

Stage II: Proposals are referred to at least two external reviewers who draft their individual reviews based on the data included in the proposal and annexes thereto, with the exception of the short project description. When the reviews are delivered, the principal investigator is interviewed. The principal investigators in proposals recommended for stage II of merit-based evaluation will receive reviews of their proposals at least 7 days before the interview. 

An interview with the principal investigator at stage II of merit-based evaluation is held in Polish or in English and is forecasted for July 2024. An exact time of the interview will be communicated to the principal investigator at least 14 days in advance.   

Based on the individual reviews of Experts and Reviewers and Expert Team’s interview with the principal investigator, the Expert Team agrees on the final evaluation of the proposal and compiles a ranking list of proposals, specifying proposals recommended for funding.

To find out more on the proposal evaluation procedure, please read the Proposal evaluation procedure for the Expert Teams and the video tutorial.

What is reviewed in the evaluation of proposals?

The following criteria are reviewed in the evaluation of proposals:

  1. compliance with the research criteria;
  2. quality and innovative nature of research or tasks to be performed;
  3. impact of the research project on the advancement of the scientific discipline;
  4. assessment of feasibility of the research;
  5. scientific achievements of the principal investigator, including publications in renowned academic press/ journals;
  6. evaluation of the results other research projects conducted by the principal investigator previously funded by the NCN or from other sources;
  7. relevance of the costs with regard to the subject and scope of the research;
  8. relevance of the choice of the host institution for the foreign fellowship, including academic rank of a foreign research institution, accuracy of the choice of the research institution and impact on the development of the principal investigator’s scientific career; and
  9. preparation of the proposal and compliance with other requirements set forth in the call text.
Proposals are evaluated pursuant to the proposal evaluation criteria applicable to SONATINA.

Who performs the merit-based evaluation of proposals?

Proposals are evaluated by inter-panel teams comprising experts appointed for particular research domains, i.e. HS, ST or NZ.

Experts are selected by the NCN Council from among outstanding Polish and foreign researchers who are at least PhD holders. Expert Teams are set up for each call edition. The composition of the Expert Team is subject to the number and subjects of proposals submitted to each panel.

When and how will the results be announced?

The call results will be published on the NCN website and communicated to the applicants by way of a decision by the NCN Director within 6 months of the proposal submission date, by the end of September 2024.

Open access publication of research results

Together with other European cOAlition S agencies, the National Science Centre has drafted its Open Access Policy. In accordance with its vision of open access to research results and publications, the NCN requires that all research results should be made available in full and immediate open access. In accordance with the principles of Plan S, the National Science Centre recognizes the following publication routes as compliant with its open access policy:

  1. publication in open access journals and on open access platforms registered, or with pending registration, in the Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ);
  2. publication in subscription journals (hybrid journals in which some of the articles are open access and some require payment of a publication fee), as long as the Version of Record (VoR, i.e. a version of record published in a journal with its own typeface and branding. Other terms: published version or publisher’s pdf) or the Author Accepted Manuscript (AAM, i.e. the final manuscript version created by the author, including all the revisions introduced after the peer review, and accepted for publication in the journal. Other terms: post print, author accepted manuscript) is published, by the author or publisher, in an open repository immediately upon the article’s online publication;
  3. publication in journals covered by an open access licence within the framework of so-called transformative agreements that must be inscribed in the Efficiency and Standards for Article Charges registry (ESAC-registry) and in transformative journals (i.e. journals actively committed to transitioning from a subscription journal to a fully open access journal. The current list of transformative journals is available here). Transformative journals must meet the criteria laid down in the Guidelines on the Implementation of Plan S and must allow open access publication of original scientific articles.

Please note: This publication route applies to articles accepted for publication or published before 31 December 2024.

Manuscripts must be published using the CC-BY licence. In the case of transformative journals, the CC-BY-SA licence can also be used. The CC-BY-ND licence may also be used (regardless of the publication route selected).

More information on open access publication terms/instructions can be found here, as amended.

For more information, please read the Open Access Instructions.

In grant agreements concluded after 1 January 2021, the data underpinning the scientific publications resulting from the project funded by the NCN must be well-documented pursuant to the FAIR Principles standing for machine or manual Findability, Accessibility, Interoperability or Reusability (the so-called “FAIR Data”). Where possible, data must be made available in the repository, according to the Creative Commons Public Domain CC0 licence (that allows the distribution of data to public domain. Pursuant to the licence, authors can give up their intellectual property rights to the extend allowed by domestic law; the licence does not affect patent rights, rights of publicity or privacy). The data citation principles laid down in the Declaration of Data Citation Principles by FORCE 11 and the TOP Guidelines must be complied with. Metadata describing the data sets must be in line with the OpenAIRE.

Where can additional information be found?

Please read the Information for Applicants available on our website.

Should you have any questions or queries, please contact us by e-mail (informacja@ncn.gov.pl).

Useful information

If you are intending to submit a proposal to SONATINA 8:

  1. read the call documents included in the call text, in particular:

a) Resolution on the terms and conditions of the SONATINA call for proposals,

b) proposal form template where you can find out about information and annexes required to complete the electronic proposal form in the OSF submission system;

c) Regulations on awarding funding for research tasks funded by the National Science Centre as regards research projects;

  1. read the proposal submission procedure;
  2. decide how long the project should last: 24 or 36 months;
  3. decide on the research institution to host the foreign fellowship and duration thereof: 3 to 6 months (full months);
  4. obtain a document (in English) confirming approval by the mentor from the research institution hosting the fellowship according to the template in the OSF submission system (Consent to the fellowship);
  5. draw up a document confirming that the principal investigator has earned a PhD degree and if the principal investigator is yet to earn a PhD degree, a declaration by the PhD supervisor or certificate by a competent institution of the forecasted PhD award date (by 30 June 2024);
  6. obtain information from the host institution that is required to complete the proposal and find out about the internal procedures that may affect the proposal submission and project performance (procedure for acquiring signature(s) of authorised representative(s) of the institution to confirm submission of the proposal);
  7. draw up the following documents:

a) in Polish:

  • description for the general public (1 standard page, A4);
  • work plan including research tasks;
  • in the case of research projects carried out by a group of entities, a research project cooperation agreement;
  • administrative declarations by the principal investigator and the host institution for the project;

b) in English:

  • project’s abstract;
  • description for the general public (1 standard page, A4);
  • work plan including research tasks;
  • research project descriptions: short project description (up to 5 standard pages, A4) and full project description (up to 15 standard pages, A4), (Project literature does not count towards the page limit);
  • information on the research team, including information on the principal investigator, as required by the call text;
  • information on the foreign research institution hosting the fellowship and justification for choosing that institution (up to 2 standard pages, A4);
  • document confirming research institution’s consent to host the foreign fellowship of the principal investigator;
  • research project budget;
  • in the case of a research project carried out in cooperation with a foreign partner, information on international cooperation as well as description of benefits that may result from such international cooperation;
  • information on the data management plan concerning data generated or used in the course of a research project;
  • information on the ethical aspects of the project, including any consents, opinions, permits and/or approvals necessary to carry out the project in compliance with generally applicable laws and best practices;
  • in the case of research projects which include clinical trials with a medicinal product or a medical device, a detailed justification of the non-commercial nature of the trials;
  • in the case of research projects covering research performed or completed by the principal investigator, or with respect to which the principal investigator applies for funding under other NCN calls or from other sources, a description of similar research tasks with reasons justifying the need to have them funded under the project; and
  • in the case of research projects to be carried out in a host institution that does not receive any operating support for research, information on research carried out over the last 2 years, together with a list of publications and information on research equipment and other instruments crucial to research.

Before the proposal is submitted to the NCN, please:

  1. check if information in and annexes to the proposal are correct. Verification of the proposal for completeness in OSF by pressing the Check completeness button does not guarantee that information has been entered correctly and that the required annexes have been attached;
  2. disable editing of the final version of the proposal to the NCN;
  3. download and sign the confirmation of proposal submission in the call (signature of the principal investigator and authorised representative of the institution); and
  4. attach the confirmation of proposal submission with a signature.

When the proposal is completed and all required annexes are attached, use the Send to NCN button to submit the proposal to the NCN electronically via the OSF submission system.

Upon the end of the call for proposals:

  1. evaluation of proposals will be carried out;
  2. after each stage of evaluation, the funding decision of the NCN Director will be served;
  3. if the proposal is recommended for funding, a research project funding agreement will be entered into; and
  4. the project will be carried out pursuant to the funding agreement.

In the event of a breach of the call procedure or other formal infringements, the applicant may appeal against the decision of the NCN Director with the Committee of Appeals of the NCN Council. The appeal must be lodged within 14 days of the effective service of the decision.

Call documents

Documents to be read before submitting a proposal to the NCN:

  1. Terms and conditions of the SONATINA call for research projects
  2. Regulations on awarding funding for research tasks funded by the National Science Centre
  3. NCN Panels
  4. Costs in research projects funded by the NCN
  5. Proposal form template
  6. List of countries where foreign fellowship may be planned under SONATINA
  7. Funds to cover the foreign fellowship travel expenses under SONATINA
  8. Research project cooperation agreement (mandatory when funding is requested by a group of entities
  9. State Aid
  10. Guidelines for applicants to complete the proposal form in OSF
  11. Guidelines for applicants to complete the data management plan for a research project
  12. Guidelines for applicants to complete the form in relation to ethical aspects of the project
  13. NCN Open Access Policy, as amended
  14. Instructions: NCN’s Open Access Policy
  15. Code of the National Science Centre on research integrity and applying for research funding
  16. Proposal submission procedure

Documents concerning evaluation of proposals:

  1. Proposal evaluation criteria
  2. Expert Teams of the National Science Centre - formation and appointing
  3. Proposal evaluation procedure for Expert Teams
  4. Service of decisions of the NCN Director
  5. Guidelines for lodging appeals against the NCN Director’s decisions

Documents to be read before commencing the NCN-funded project:

  1. Agreement template
  2. Order establishing a procedure for conducting audits on Host Institution’s premises
  3. Guidelines for entities auditing the implementation of research projects funded by the National Science Centre
  4. Evaluation of monographs in research projects funded by the National Science Centre
  5. NCN Council Resolution on collaboration with the Russian Federation within the framework of NCN-funded grants

Results of Weave-UNISONO call for bilateral Polish-Czech research projects

Thu, 12/14/2023 - 16:00
Kod CSS i JS

Researchers from Poland and the Czech Republic will carry out joint research projects within the framework of NCN’s collaboration with the Czech Science Foundation (GAČR). Researchers will be awarded nearly 5 million zlotys for their research. Four projects will be performed in Physical Sciences and Engineering, and one in Arts, Humanities and Social Sciences.

Prof. Dr hab. inż. Janusz Datta from the Gdańsk University of Technology has been awarded funding for his project “Sustainable polyurethanes: from cradle to grave with the help of enzymes”. Dr Martin Halecký from the University of Chemistry and Technology in Prague and Dr Hynek Benes from the Institute of Macromolecular Chemistry, Czech Academy of Sciences will be the principal investigators. The project will receive funding of over 1 million zlotys.

Quantum geometric representation theory and noncommutative fibrations will be studied by Prof. Tomasz Brzeziński from the University of Białystok and Dr Réamonn Ó Buachalla from the Charles University in Prague. The Polish part of the project will have a budget of nearly 920 thousand zlotys.

Prof. Marek Sikorski will work on the project “Photoredox catalysis with organic anions – perspective area for flavin derivatives”, together with Prof. Radek Cibulka from the University of Chemistry and Technology in Prague as the principal investigator on the Czech part. The Polish part of the project will have a budget of over 1.4 million zlotys.

Nearly 840 thousand zlotys was awarded to the project on graded differential geometry with applications which, on the Polish part, will be managed by Prof. Dr hab. Janusz Grabowski from the Mathematical Institute of the Polish Academy of Sciences. He will pursue research in collaboration Dr Oleksii Kotov from the University of Hradec Králové and Dr Jan Vysoky from the Czech Technical University in Prague.

In Arts, Humanities and Social Sciences, funding of over 550 thousand zlotys will go to Dr hab. Stanisław Pijaj from the Jagiellonian University for his project “Civil society and the birth of elections: the voting culture of the 1848 Revolution on the example of the Bohemian lands, Galicia, and Bukovina” which will be performed together with Dr Luboš Velek from the Masaryk Institute and Archives of the Czech Republic.

Recommended projects have been evaluated by the Czech Science Foundation (GACR) as the Lead Agency. The National Science Centre approved the results of evaluation under the Weave collaboration and decided to fund projects recommended by the GACR.

Weave-UNISONO

The Weave-UNISONO call is the result of multilateral cooperation between research-funding agencies associated in Science Europe and aims at simplifying the submission and selection procedures for research proposals that bring together researchers from two or three different European countries in any discipline of science.

The selection process is based on the Lead Agency Procedure (LAP), under which only one partner institution is responsible for merit-based review and the others simply accept the result.

Under Weave, partner research teams apply in parallel to the lead agency and their relevant domestic institutions. Their joint proposal must include coherent research programmes and clearly spell out the added value of international cooperation.

The Weave-UNISONO call accepts proposals on a rolling basis. Polish teams wishing to partner up with colleagues from Austria, Czech Republic, Slovenia, Switzerland, Germany, Luxembourg and Belgium-Flanders are encouraged to carefully read the call text and submit their funding proposals.

IMPRESS-U: information on proposals made in the OSF submission system

Wed, 12/13/2023 - 17:00
Kod CSS i JS

As the end of the year is coming closer, do not forget that NCN proposals submitted to the IMPRESS-u call and processed in the OSF submission system in 2023 must be sent via OSF by 31 December 2023, 23:59:59. Otherwise, a new proposal will have to be processed in 2024.

NCN proposals can only be submitted to the OSF submission system following submission of a joint proposal to the lead agency (NSF). Under the IMPRESS-U call, NCN proposals must be submitted to the National Science Centre electronically via the OSF submission system as soon as possible following submission of the joint proposal, within 7 calendar days.

Women in science: Marta Pacia and Aleksandra Rutkowska

Wed, 12/13/2023 - 12:00
Kod CSS i JS

Today, we discuss equal opportunities for men and women in science with Dr inż. Marta Pacia from the Jagiellonian Centre for Drug Development and Dr Aleksandra Rutkowska from the Brain Disease Centre at the Medical University of Gdańsk, winners of the L’Oréal-UNESCO For Women in Science awards.

The International Awards L’Oréal-UNESCO For Women in Science are designed to support talented women scientists involved in life sciences research. The Polish edition is part of the global For Women in Science programme organised in more than 100 countries. Over the past 20 years in Poland, the jury has honoured 123 women at different career levels: MSc students, PhD candidates and pre-habilitation researchers. In the last iteration, concluded in November, the winners were Natalia Sauer, Angelika Andrzejewicz-Romanowska, Elżbieta Wątor, Marta Pacia, Aleksandra Rutkowska and Magdalena Zdrowowicz-Żamojć. They have all conducted research funded by the NCN.

Marta Pacia, photo: LOreal-UNESCO For Women and ScienceMarta Pacia, photo: LOreal-UNESCO For Women and Science Dr inż. Marta Pacia works at the Jagiellonian Centre for Drug Development at the Jagiellonian University. She has completed four NCN-funded projects. Her research is interdisciplinary in scope and centres on the new aspects of lipid droplets and their contribution to endothelial dysfunction in the context of vascular inflammation in cardiovascular disease. “I would like my research findings to find practical applications in endothelial biomedicine. This is very challenging because the results of any single study in this field are usually just a piece in a larger jigsaw puzzle, and only the whole can have an appreciable impact on contemporary science”, she says. Dr Aleksandra Rutkowska works at the Brain Disease Centre of the Medical University of Gdańsk. She has executed three NCN projects. Her research focuses on the brain, and in particular on brain processes and repair ability. “My greatest dream is to contribute to the development of new drugs that would unleash the brain’s repair potential. I would like to do my bit to give patients with SM and other neurodegenerative diseases a new hope for a fuller, more active life”, she explains.

In praise of diversity and “daily mentoring”

“The situation of women in science is improving; it is definitely better than several or more years ago. There is also more awareness of the need to react to blatant discrimination against women, especially in STEM fields. When I just started my freshmen year at university, I remember one of our lecturers said something to the effect of ‘the gentlemen will remember, the ladies will note it down’. If that happened today, I believe he would be instantly called out for it”, says Dr Marta Pacia. Pacia adds that this was just an isolated incident and she has otherwise been lucky to work in environments that promote equality and put the emphasis on “skills and hard work”. She underscores that in order for us to create equal opportunities for men and women in science, we need to make provisions for career breaks in the bylaws of research-funding institutions (such as the NCN or the ERC) or scholarship programmes. “Provisions of this kind would limit the negative effects of unplanned career breaks, such as, e.g. prolonged sick leaves, but also appease women’s fear of a longer hiatus related to childbirth, for example. Thanks to such measures, women who decide to have a baby won’t lose the ability to apply for research funding when one of the submission criteria is age or the number of years that have elapsed since their PhD. In general, this gives everyone a better chance to reconcile research with parenting, but it’s still not easy”, she adds.

Anna Korzekwa-Józefowicz: Speaking for the organisers of L’Oréal-UNESCO For Women in Science, you mentioned the perks of working in a diverse environment.

Marta Pacia: I think that diversity on many levels, in terms of gender, educational background and skills, is crucial for science. Working in a highly diverse environment allows you to remain open to change and increases your flexibility when it comes to worldview and problem-solving. A person with a background in physics will approach a research problem differently than someone with a background in chemistry or biology.

I believe that research teams that are internally diverse, especially in terms of research experience, but also in terms of gender, are more creative and efficient. The diversity of perspectives really contributes to achieving innovative solutions.

AKJ: The L’Oréal-UNESCO programme definitely boosts women’s visibility in science. Women researchers I have talked with thus far often emphasise the importance of various mentoring initiatives and the support that more senior women researchers provide to their junior colleagues. Is your experience similar?

MP: I have never benefited from any organised mentoring initiative, probably because initiatives of this kind have only become popular recently and when I was a PhD student they weren’t that widespread. I think that mentoring is extremely helpful, especially for the community of junior researchers. But I completely agree that winning the L’Oréal-UNESCO For Women and Science award has contributed in an important way to increasing my recognisability in the research world.

While I completely support organised mentoring initiatives for young women, I believe what really matters in your career is the “daily mentoring” of the people you work with from day to day. I have always been lucky to work with excellent researchers, both men and women, who have impacted my research capability and helped me always achieve increasingly ambitious goals.

When I was a PhD candidate, I also had the pleasure of working with a woman advisor who not only shaped my career path at that time, but also my entire worldview, which is something I fell very grateful for. Last year, when I was approached by a female PhD student from our research unit, who asked me to help with her grant application, I said yes, even though we only had two weeks left before the deadline, because this is something that my advisor once did for me. Just to be clear, if a male PhD student came to me with a similar request, my decision would be the same. I feel really happy to be able to pass on the support I once experienced to others.

AKJ: What initiatives do you think we should take to support gender equality in science? I mean especially low-cost ideas that could be easily implemented at the level of any research institution.

MP: Making provisions for career breaks, especially maternity leave, in annual researcher assessment schemes, slot-based evaluation or other forms of assessment. When it comes to parenting breaks, the situation has improved a lot with the decision to allow researchers to extend their project duration, both at the NCN, and at my own unit, the Jagiellonian University. Overall, the goals set by the Jagiellonian University in its Gender Equality Plan are both ambitious and well-defined, so I am keeping my fingers crossed for their implementation.

A lot still remains to be done

Aleksandra Rutkowska, photo: LOreal-UNESCO For Women and ScienceAleksandra Rutkowska, photo: LOreal-UNESCO For Women and Science When asked about the situation of women in science, Dr Aleksandra Rutkowska also admits that it has improved in recent years, but hastens to add that a lot still remains to be done. “Efforts to counteract differences in how men and women are perceived and promote women’s participation in STEM fields are gaining momentum, which helps raise awareness of the problem and fosters new policies and initiatives aimed at levelling the playing field. But we still need to do a lot more before we can say that women enjoy equal opportunities, recognition and resources in the world of science”, she says. Rutkowska argues that for women’s position in science to change, what we need is “a higher representation of women in executive positions, a greater visibility of women researchers in the media, and better support mechanisms for women in science”.

During the L’Oréal-UNESCO awards ceremony, she pointed out that the “first seven years after the PhD are critical in the career of any researcher” and called for the widespread implementation of solutions that would enable women to include maternity-related career breaks. “I was 12 weeks pregnant when I defended my PhD dissertation; for the next 6 years, I was either pregnant or on maternity leave”, she recalled.

Anna Korzekwa-Józefowicz asked Dr Rutkowska about solutions that could make it easier for women to reconcile their family and research roles. Dr Rutkowska replied: “The extension of the period during which one is still defined as a ‘young researcher’ to account for maternity leave has allowed me to continue my work in research after I had my three kids. Without it, I would have had to give up my research career altogether. From my perspective, this is the key solution behind the increase in the number of women getting their habilitated doctor degree that we have seen in recent years. Before, we would lose the majority of women in the period between their PhD and their habilitation. Similar solutions have already been put in place at the NCN, the NCBiR, FNP and for the scholarships from the Ministry of Education and Science. However, some awards and distinctions still make no allowances for that hiatus”.

Rutkowska also adds that “both in grant application and habilitation proceedings, there remains the great challenge of levelling the playing field in terms of mobility”.

“Young researchers are expected to complete several international postdoctoral fellowships. It is a criterion considered and appreciated by reviewers in grant and award programmes and habilitation proceedings. The problem was partly addressed under the SONATINA grant; the NCN now awards an extra 3,000 zlotys per each month of the fellowship to support the researcher’s family. The fellowship can also be reduced to 3 months or divided into shorter periods. Such solutions are needed on a much greater scale to allow young researchers to grow their careers.

“Even though the period spent on maternity leave is formally included in record assessment, reviewers often skip this criterion or, perhaps, simply lack the necessary information, which often results in a negative assessment of gaps in the publication record. Perhaps a solution to address this situation would be to train reviewers or provide them with clear information on career breaks. At the NCN, such information is already included in the proposal and I have never been criticised for gaps in my publication record when applying to the NCN. However, I have received such criticism in other basic research-funding institutions. Importantly, and I want to emphasise this, enforcing uniform research record assessment practices across different research-funding institutions could help eliminate potential disparities in the treatment of applicants”, says Dr Rutkowska.

The NCN has already introduced several solutions to help women researchers reconcile their family and research roles. We extended the period during which young mothers can apply for post-docs and young researchers’ grants after their PhD by 1.5 years per child (biological or adopted); we also modified the time criteria in our research record assessment process. More about NCN’s efforts to foster gender equality in science.

Since 2024, to promote greater equality within the research community, the NCN Award will also be based on new criteria. The greatest change has to do with the maximum age of candidates who can be nominated for the award. Until now, the criterion was based on chronological age (up to 40); from now on, it is the academic age that will count (i.e. up to 12 years after the PhD).

Equality issues are also addressed in our promotion and information campaigns.

We also hold conversations about how to level the playing field for men and women and help everyone reconcile their work and family roles. To date we have published interviews with:

Weave-UNISONO call: important notice for Polish research teams

Tue, 12/12/2023 - 15:00
Kod CSS i JS

1. The budget of the Polish part of the project in the joint proposal should be calculated according to the following exchange rates:

  • in joint proposals, for which NCN proposals are processed in and submitted via the OSF submission system by 31 December 2023: 1 EUR = 4.7244 PLN;
  • in joint proposals, for which NCN proposals are processed in and submitted via the OSF submission system from 1 January 2024: 1 EUR = 4.5940 PLN;

2. NCN proposals processed in the OSF submission system in 2023, with the exchange rate of 1 EUR = 4.7244 PLN, must be completed in and submitted via the OSF submission system by 31 December 2023 at 23:59:59. Otherwise, the proposal can no longer be edited, in which case the Polish research team must prepare a new proposal, with the exchange rate 1 EUR = 4.5940 PLN, and complete it in the OSF submission system. If a joint proposal has already been submitted to the lead agency, with the budget of the Polish part of the project calculated according to another exchange rate, the NCN proposal will be inconsistent with the joint proposal and as a consequence the proposal may be rejected on the grounds that it does not meet the eligibility criteria.

3. As of 1 January 2024, the updated Regulations on awarding funding for research tasks funded by the National Science Centre under international calls carried out as multilateral cooperation pursuant to the Lead Agency Procedure shall apply.

4. Please consult the updated call documents, including the Guidelines for Polish research teams.

POLONEZ BIS Fellows and Mentors met in Krakow

Tue, 12/12/2023 - 13:00
Kod CSS i JS

Over 100 scientists participated in the third and the last POLONEZ BIS Kick-off meeting. The meeting was held at the beginning of December, at the NCN headquarters.

The Fellows and Mentors whose research projects started this autumn or will take off in January and April 2024 took part in the Kick-off meeting. The two-day event was an opportunity for the scientists to get to know other Fellows and to develop a network of contacts across Poland. The kick-off started with a presentation by Dr Iwona Bielska, a Fellow awarded in the first POLONEZ BIS call, who shared with the new PIs and their Mentors her year-long experience of working and living in Poland. It was followed by a workshop on the career development, conducted by CRAC-Vitae, an institutional partner of the POLONEZ BIS programme. Its aim was to support the all-round development of researchers, i.e. through a special Vitae Researcher Development Framework (RDF) Planner platform. The second, very popular workshop session, was devoted to open access to publications and research data. Fellows also learned about cross-sector secondments and ways of promoting their scientific projects.

The third kick-off meeting was the last one in a series of events kicking off the implementation of projects under the POLONEZ BIS programme. Fellows will continue to meet during the training programme and during the POLONEZ Fellows Forum scheduled for 2024.

Gallery

zdjęcie
zdjęcie
zdjęcie
zdjęcie
zdjęcie
zdjęcie
zdjęcie
zdjęcie
zdjęcie
zdjęcie
zdjęcie
zdjęcie
zdjęcie
zdjęcie
zdjęcie
zdjęcie
zdjęcie
zdjęcie
zdjęcie
zdjęcie
zdjęcie
zdjęcie
zdjęcie
zdjęcie
zdjęcie
zdjęcie
zdjęcie
zdjęcie
zdjęcie
zdjęcie
zdjęcie
zdjęcie
zdjęcie
zdjęcie
zdjęcie
zdjęcie
zdjęcie
zdjęcie
zdjęcie
zdjęcie
zdjęcie
zdjęcie
zdjęcie
zdjęcie
zdjęcie
zdjęcie

EOSC Festival 2023.The National Tripartite Event Poland

Mon, 12/11/2023 - 14:00
Kod CSS i JS

The second EOSC Festival 2023.The National Tripartite Event Poland gathered the stakeholders of European Open Science Cloud (EOSC), who engaged in discussions on Open Science (OS) and the future of the EOSC. The focus was on key issues related to OS policy and implementation and EOSC development in Widening Countries and beyond. With over 40 contributors from 13 countries, it attracted more than 258 participants, both in-person and online.

Bertil Egger Beck, European Comission, photo credit: Michał ŁepeckiBertil Egger Beck, European Comission, photo credit: Michał Łepecki The distinguished keynote speakers included Bertil Egger Beck from the European Commission’s DG Research and Innovation (DG RTD), Volker Beckmann, the French delegate to the EOSC Steering Board (EOSC-SB), Karel Luyben, President of the EOSC Association (EOSC-A) and Mateusz Gaczyński from the Polish Ministry of Education and Science. Additionally, contributors from Bulgaria, Croatia, Czech Republic, Georgia, Lithuania, Malta, North Macedonia, Serbia, Slovakia, Romania, Ukraine, and Poland discussed the EOSC readiness from the perspective of their countries. The 19 Polish stakeholders demonstrated long-term commitment to developing OS and EOSC infrastructures, services, and skills in Poland, aiming to establish a mature and fully operational EOSC national structure.

Overall, the event significantly enriched discussions on OS policies and their implementation at both national and European levels, focusing on the future of EOSC and considering the perspectives of Widening Countries in these discussions. It provided a strong foundation for future collaborations.

The event was hosted at the headquarters of the National Science Centre in Kraków on November 6th and 7th.

The National Science Centre wishes to acknowledge all EOSC Festival contributors: speakers, panelists, moderators, and participants.

Representatives of the Widening Countries

Ana Proykova (Sofia University, Faculty of Physics, HPC Laboratory, Bulgaria); Ivan Maric (University Computing Centre (SRCE), University of Zagreb, Croatia), Olga Bohuslavova (Masarykova University CERITSC/Sekretariát EOSC-CZ, Czech Republic), Tatia Mtvarelidze (Ministry of Education and Science of Georgia), Artūras Kaklauskas (Research Council of Lithuania), Ernest Cachia (University of Malta, Department of Computer Information Systems, Malta), Anastas Mishev (University of Ss Cyril and Methodius, Faculty of Computer Science and Engineering, North Macedonia), Alina Irimina (UEFISCDI, Romania), Biljana Kosanovic (University of Belgrade, Serbia), Milica Ševkušić (Open Access Programme, Project Coordinator EIFL – Electronic Information for Libraries, Serbia), Anna Krivjanská (Slovak Centre of Scientific and Technical Information representatives of EOSC TF Upskilling Countries, Slovakia), Volodymyr Nochvai (Virtual Center for Digital Innovation NOSCUA DIH, Open Innovation Lab, Kyiv Academic University, Ukraine), Sergiy Svistunov (Bogolyubov Institute for Theoretical Physics of the National Academy of Science of Ukraine (online).

Polish stakeholders

Dominika Czyzak (Nicolaus Copernicus University in Torun), Dariusz Ignatiuk (Polish Polar Consortium), Mateusz Gaczyński (Ministry of Education and Science, Poland), Tomasz Jałukowicz (SWPS University), Szymon Kubik (Collegium Medicum of Jagiellonian University), Krzysztof Kurowski and Raimundas Tuminauskas (Poznan Supercomputing and Networking Centre, Mariusz Majdański (Institute of Geophysics of Polish Academy of Sciences), Maciej Maryl and Tomasz Umerle (Digital Humanities Centre, the ILR of the Polish Academy of Sciences), Dawid Matuszek and Maciej Bisaga (University of Silesia in Katowice), Marcin Michalak (Łukasiewicz Research Network – Institute of Innovative Technologies EMAG), Jakub Szlachetko (SOLARIS Centre National Synchrotron Radiation Centre, Jagiellonian University), Marcin Pałys (European University Association), Maciej Piasecki (University of Science and Technology in Wroclaw, CLARIN-PL), Jakub Rusakow (Gdansk Medical University), Leszek Szafrański (Jagiellonian University), Jakub Szprot (Interdisciplinary Centre for Mathematical and Computational Modelling University of Warsaw), Roksana Wilk (Cyfronet AGH in Krakow), Anna Zatora (University of Lodz).

The representatives of the Tripartite Collaboration: The European Commission EOSC Steering Board and EOSC association

Bertil Egger Beck from the European Commission’s DG Research and Innovation (DG RTD), Volker Beckmann, French delegate to the EOSC Steering Board (EOSC-SB), Karel Luyben, President of the EOSC Association (President, EOSC-A) and Isabel Caetano (Senior Stakeholder Engagement and Outreach Officer, EOSC-A).

Panel discussion, EOSC and Open Science: policies and implementation, photo credit: Michał ŁepeckiPanel discussion, EOSC and Open Science: policies and implementation, photo credit: Michał Łepecki

Gallery

zdjęcie
zdjęcie
zdjęcie
zdjęcie
zdjęcie
zdjęcie
zdjęcie
zdjęcie
zdjęcie
zdjęcie
zdjęcie
zdjęcie
zdjęcie
zdjęcie
zdjęcie
zdjęcie
zdjęcie
zdjęcie
zdjęcie
zdjęcie
zdjęcie
zdjęcie
zdjęcie
zdjęcie
zdjęcie
zdjęcie
zdjęcie
zdjęcie
zdjęcie
zdjęcie

Six Polish research teams with Biodiversa+ grants

Thu, 12/07/2023 - 14:03
Kod CSS i JS

Researchers from Białowieża, Łódź, Kraków, Sopot and Warsaw are among the recent winners of the BiodivMon call organised by the European Biodiversity Partnership Biodiversa+. They will work on projects focused on improving the system of monitoring biodiversity and ecosystem change.

Announced in September 2022, BiodivMon – Improved transnational monitoring of biodiversity and ecosystem change for science and society, covered the following themes:

  1. Innovation and harmonization of methods and tools for collection and management of biodiversity monitoring data;
  2. Addressing knowledge gaps on biodiversity status, dynamics, and trends to reverse biodiversity loss;
  3. Making use of available biodiversity monitoring data.

Researchers from 33 different countries could join the BiodivMon call, organised by 46 research-funding organizations, to compete for grants covering three-year international research projects. In the end, 262 pre-proposals and 108 full proposals were submitted, out of which an independent panel of experts selected 33 with a total budget of 46 million euro.

Polish teams are involved in six of these successful projects. Their total budget is 6.8 million zlotys, nearly 1.7 million of which will come from an EU subsidy.

The following is the list of winning Polish projects:

  • WOBEC: Weddell Sea Observatory of Biodiversity and Ecosystem Change. Principal investigator: Dr hab. Józef Wiktor, Instytut Oceanologii Polskiej Akademii Nauk.
  • DNAquaIMG: Innovating transnational aquatic biodiversity monitoring using high-throughput DNA tools and automated image recognition. Polish principal investigator: Dr hab. Karolina Bącela-Spychalska, Uniwersytet Łódzki.
  • FunDive: Monitoring and mapping fungal diversity for nature conservation. Polish principal investigator: dr hab. Julia Pawłowska, Uniwersytet Warszawski.
  • WildINTEL: Building a scalable WILDlife monitoring system by integrating remote camera sampling and artificial INTELligence with Essential Biodiversity Variables Polish principal investigator/PI of the WildINTEL project: Dr hab. Nuria Selva Fernandez, Instytut Ochrony Przyrody Polskiej Akademii Nauk.
  • SoilRise: Raising awareness for soil biodiversity and multiplying monitoring by student-based Citizen Science. Polish principal investigator: Dr hab. inż. Agnieszka Józefowska, Uniwersytet Rolniczy im. Hugona Kołłątaja w Krakowie.
  • BIG_PICTURE: Developing data management and analytical tools to integrate and advance professional and citizen science camera-trapping initiatives across Europe. Polish principal investigator: Dr Jakub Bubicki, Instytut Biologii Ssaków Polskiej Akademii Nauk.

Online lecture by Katharina Boguslawski

Thu, 12/07/2023 - 14:00
Kod CSS i JS

On 14 December, join us for a talk entitled “The Quantum Path to Chemistry” by Katharina Boguslawski, winner of the 2023 NCN Award for Physical Sciences and Engineering, in the framework of the “Science at the Centre” series.

Katharina Boguslawski is a quantum chemist working at the Nicolaus Copernicus University in Toruń and member of the Polish Young Academy, PAS. Her research combines chemistry, physics, mathematics and applied computer science. Bouguslawski focuses on developing innovative computing methods to model the properties of large chemical molecules without the need for experiments.

She is currently a PI under ERC’s StG 2022 and NCN’S SONATA BIS.  In October, she won a 2023 NCN Award in recognition of two achievements: building a simple and reliable quantum mechanical model of actinide compounds and using quantum information theory to develop innovative methods to study electron structures and track actinide chemical reactions.

At 6 pm on 14 December, within the framework of the “Science at the Centre” series, organised together by the NCN and the Copernicus Center for Interdisciplinary Research, she will deliver an online lecture entitled “The Quantum Path to Chemistry, or What Theoretical Chemistry Can Teach Us About Chemical Reactions”. The talk will be streamed on the YouTube channel of the Copernicus Center in English with Polish subtitles.

Prof. Katharina Boguslawski is actively involved in initiatives for equal gender opportunities in science and was interviewed as part of our “Women in Science”. series.

In November, “Science at the Centre” hosted talks by Karolina Ćwiek-Rogalska and Łukasz Opaliński. Videos are now available online. The “Science at the Centre” playlist also features lectures by NCN Award winners from 2020-2023.

Polish and Norwegian scientists working together on humanities and social research

Tue, 12/05/2023 - 11:00
Kod CSS i JS

The headquarters of the National Science Centre in Kraków hosted a conference promoting the Basic Research programme funded under the 3rd EEA and Norway Grants’ edition. This year, the event was devoted to Humanities and Social Sciences.

Organised by the National Science Centre, the conference brought together renowned researchers, innovators and stakeholders from Poland and Norway, providing them with a platform to share knowledge and exchange experiences.

“Sharing knowledge and ideas among researchers from different backgrounds is the foundation for the advancement of knowledge”, emphasised Dr Marcin Liana, Deputy NCN Director at the opening of the conference. In her address, Siv Haugan, delegate of the Research Council of Norway, the institution that represents the Donors in the Basic Research programme, added that the Donors consider Humanities and Social Sciences an important research area and presented the opportunities for funding in these disciplines under Horizon Europe.

During the conference, project teams and individual researchers from Polish and Norwegian academic centres also presented their research projects and detailed the findings they had obtained in grants awarded under calls such as GRIEG, POLS and IDEALAB. Participants could find out, for instance, how online social networks can support collective resistance to disinformation, hear about women’s activism and its moral and cultural foundations from the example of Kurdish society, and learn how psychology and social development sciences could be combined to test the relationship between folk theories of social development and the concept of ideal wellbeing.

The conference also featured an expert panel entitled Social Transformations in the Age of Polarization, moderated by Prof. Nina Witoszek from the University of Oslo. Its panellists discussed the challenges of mounting social polarisation, shared their observations and recommended possible measures.

The panellists included researchers working on Polish-Norwegian projects under the GRIEG call: Dr Katarzyna Jaśko from the Jagiellonian University, Dr hab. Jarosław Michałowski from the SWPS University of Social Sciences and Humanities and Dr Paweł Marczewski from the Stefan Batory Foundation, operator of the Active Citizens programme under the 3rd EEA and Norway Grants. They presented their research findings from projects focused on social challenges in the age of polarisation, and together arrived at the following conclusions:

  • understanding: they emphasised the need to understand the multifaceted nature of societies, including the complex social impact of polarisation on a local and global scale;
  • dialogue and empathy: they pointed out the necessity of social dialogue at every stage of decision-making that impacts societies, including the need to work toward an inclusive society that would integrate diverse viewpoints and cultivate empathy as the key tools to mitigate polarisation.

The panel moderator, Prof. Nina Witoszek, also underscored the important role of research and education in addressing civilisational challenges in an increasingly diverse world.

About EEA and Norway Grants

EEA and Norway Grants consist of funds donated by Iceland, Liechtenstein and Norway to reduce social and economic disparities within the European Economic Area and strengthen bilateral relations with the 15 beneficiary countries in Central and Southern Europe.

To learn more about the programme, as well the projects and plans for further cooperation, watch our conference video.

zdjęcie
zdjęcie
zdjęcie
zdjęcie
zdjęcie
zdjęcie